Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

27
Hmmmm.... (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 2 years ago by Traxx 2 years ago by Traxx +31 / -4
54 comments download share
54 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
▲ -2 ▼
– Modeler42 -2 points 2 years ago +2 / -4

If you used sarcasm, then you didn’t give a genuine answer.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Traxx [S] 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

Strangest answer ever.

Sarcasm is an answer. If your sensitive self cannot get it, that's on you.

Stop seeking a loophole where you are correct... You just prove that sarcasm > you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– WeThePepele 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Riddle me this ya goof: If Little Saint James Island doesn't have an airport, much less an airstrip/runway, what in the actual fuck are flight logs proving on their own? You're the kind of moron that thinks being photographed with someone notorious proves guilt in a crime too, aren't you? You're just projecting, calling everyone else's comments a waste of time. lmao

Actual evidence or STFU and GTFO. NOBODY cares what you THINK or ASSUME to be true, nor does anyone care about you trying to dodge having to say "I don't know" or "I can't prove it". "bUt mUh lOLiTa eXpReSs" lol prove it for any one single person on the flight logs that you're waving around like it's some smoking gun. Do you have any ACTUAL evidence or just your hunchy feelz?

I know the saying probably makes your bussy hurt but, INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. That even applies to people you do not like. Sorry, kiddo. (lol not sorry)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Traxx [S] 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

Wow, I guess you had a lot bottled up already... Does this keyboard warrior sh*t works for you? Is venting online and insulting a new trend you picked up on tik tok?

I get it, you're a shill for Trump and you are here to clear his name by insulting anyone, who offers anything against him. Well, people in here are not as stupid as you are, so you would have a lot of work on insulting random people.

I guess you have some dirt on you that you keep safe by insulting others to oblivion. Doesn't work though... You call me "kiddo", yet you are not one acting like a child... :D Thanks for that, it makes my reply very easy. :D I don't even have to insult you. You are one step from becoming a psychopath... I don't want to be the one who pushed you over the edge... You seem quite unstable already...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– WeThePepele 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

So, no proof? lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– Modeler42 -3 points 2 years ago +2 / -5

It’s not about getting it or not getting it. Sarcasm is the antithesis of being genuine.

You didn’t give a genuine answer, you gave a sarcastic answer.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Traxx [S] 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

Well, now you are dancing around a technicality on what YOU thought the meaning of genuine is. Whatever... If you didn't get the sarcasm the first time, you could've gotten it already since I said it was sarcasm... and "figure out" my response somehow using advanced mental ability... Or just figuring out what sarcasm is...

I get it though... You were in too much in the conversation and now you want to win the argument by standing on a technicality because you don't like my responses. It's not unusual. I guess you need more experience in that area to figure out that this type of conversation or "fake winning an argument" leads nowhere. You can count it as a +1 on conversations I could've saved if I wasn't so arrogant to get my way at all cost.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ -3 ▼
– Modeler42 -3 points 2 years ago +1 / -4

It's what the definition of sarcasm literally is.

But I digress, we can continue.

So every single person on the flight log has paid to rape children. Is their presence on this list the only available evidence, or is there something more concrete (like a money trail, or photo evidence, or some sort of witness testimony)?

Does this sufficient evidence exist for each and every person on the list, or is it only implied guilt through association?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy