It's bullshit. Adrenochrome is oxidised epinephrine. Epinephrine still does that job. It being used to treat anaphylaxis, poison etc. Dopamine is also another.
Stem cells are the current anti aging revitalisation treatment.
Some have suggested and tried blood, many myths around it, fresh virgin and baby blood. It possibly provides some vitality, what doesn't, seriously, picture it, need to kill for the hunger, you're gonna live to get fed, dining on whatever appetite, until you still drop dead, because it doesn't stop aging.
What is showing some signs of stopping aging is dna manipulation gene editing prior to insemination. And it is showing some potential in current experiments on mice and such.
This topic is nonsense. Although it's not impossible. There are sick perverted people. But they don't live forever
Holy shit the first voice of reason regarding adrenochrome that I have encountered online.
Adrenochrome has had some successful use in some cardiac study, read the paper a long time ago, but other than that yeah oxidized adrenaline, that you can re easily buy from any number of suppliers. https://aobious.com/aobious/products/13456-adrenochrome.html
I bought adrenochrome ~20 years ago to prove the point. I mean I guess I havent died yet, but I entirely expect to within reasonable lifetime.
I dont know about the adrenochrome. But considering stem cells are proven to be floating around the blood and young blood seems to have more of them. Seems possible enough that there was a business who supposedly did this.
Young blood has rejuvenating, anti-aging properties that scientists are trying to tap into. A new study published in the journal Cell Reports now brings us one step closer to determining what it is in the young blood that age-reversing properties.
A few years ago, scientists discovered that when they gave young blood to old mice, something pretty astounding happens in their brains. The older mice get more stem cells, produce more neurons, the connections between their neurons become stronger, and their spatial memory improves. The effects of aging in the brain are, in large part, reversed.
Dr. Saul Villeda, an assistant professor of anatomy at the University of California San Francisco, is the senior author on the new study. His lab made the initial discovery that older mice's brains start behaving like younger ones, when old and young mice are surgically attached together. It's a process called parabiosis. Not only that, but the younger mice's brains appear older too.
Although the article goes onto to say they are still trying to figure out the exact component responsible for the results.
Bullshit study on blood. It didn't get much further. It didn't anti age. It provided some vitality benefits. Cognetive functions.
The study was inconclusive. Surgically attached mice? Hahaha. It aged the donor, younger mice rapidly, but provided the older mice with improved cognitive functions. So what.
They went on to test it. Old people were given blood transfusions at 6k a pop. How did that go?
You haven't researched it much more, that was almost a decade ago. 2014. So what went wrong? It was taking over from other studies again the research went dark. Stopped. 1930-50s? Something. Then decades later back to it.
Kim Jung Il, right? Supposedly transfused virgin blood regularly. How old did he live for? There have been others transplanting very young organs.
Stemcells, are in treatments, creams, organ transplants, plastic surgery. They are far more effective.
But where there are the claims of increased longevity is manipulating the DNA by editing the genes of the mice. They have lived for around 30% longer.
This cannot be done on humans or you're creating clones, suggestively they can faster be harvested for benefits. Or it's new human beings grown by artifical insemination and embryo manipulation by gene editing. They have done this to some extents. Researching it more in quite a few programs. More is off the grid. Studies not Googled. But claims of.
That tech isn't there yet. To knowledge.
But the blood shit is pretty much myth outside of some vitality benefits. Almost everything else has similar claims of vitality.
Or find what happened to the rest of that linked study? It's been almost a decade 2014, whatever. Same as it did decades ago I'd imagine. The stuff of vampires. Myths and cannibals.
The fundamental problem is if somebody has cracked it. They'd never publicise it. It to my knowledge has not, not by blood, because it has a heap of other problems related on repeated transfusion.
They've started the clones. Unclear how cloned. I think they've almost done it all outside of a surrogate. How cloned, a cloned emybro put into a surrogate and artificially inseminated yes? Except I believe they've done the whole thing artificially. I am shocked it has gone ahead. Not that shocked. Matter of time. Despite everybody else spewing ethics.
Back to the blood. Yawn. The above is there. Its implications are far worse.
Whatever retard. That stupid down vote. Because you needed to prove what topically? You linked shit regarding a 2014 study. How far did those transfusions go? The human trials. Did they stop aging? What are you down voting?
Instead like a generic monkey. You haven't understood me. Because you needed a myth of vampirism?
It's bullshit. Adrenochrome is oxidised epinephrine. Epinephrine still does that job. It being used to treat anaphylaxis, poison etc. Dopamine is also another.
Stem cells are the current anti aging revitalisation treatment.
Some have suggested and tried blood, many myths around it, fresh virgin and baby blood. It possibly provides some vitality, what doesn't, seriously, picture it, need to kill for the hunger, you're gonna live to get fed, dining on whatever appetite, until you still drop dead, because it doesn't stop aging.
What is showing some signs of stopping aging is dna manipulation gene editing prior to insemination. And it is showing some potential in current experiments on mice and such.
This topic is nonsense. Although it's not impossible. There are sick perverted people. But they don't live forever
Holy shit the first voice of reason regarding adrenochrome that I have encountered online.
Adrenochrome has had some successful use in some cardiac study, read the paper a long time ago, but other than that yeah oxidized adrenaline, that you can re easily buy from any number of suppliers. https://aobious.com/aobious/products/13456-adrenochrome.html
I bought adrenochrome ~20 years ago to prove the point. I mean I guess I havent died yet, but I entirely expect to within reasonable lifetime.
I dont know about the adrenochrome. But considering stem cells are proven to be floating around the blood and young blood seems to have more of them. Seems possible enough that there was a business who supposedly did this.
https://www.businessinsider.com/young-blood-transfusions-open-accepting-paypal-payments-cities-ambrosia-2019-1?r=UK&IR=T
Although the article goes onto to say they are still trying to figure out the exact component responsible for the results.
Weird lol.
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks/march-3-2018-detecting-the-first-stars-young-blood-rejuvenation-acoustic-tractor-beam-more-1.4557129/the-vampire-molecule-scientists-discover-why-young-blood-helps-reverse-aging-1.4557132
Bullshit study on blood. It didn't get much further. It didn't anti age. It provided some vitality benefits. Cognetive functions.
The study was inconclusive. Surgically attached mice? Hahaha. It aged the donor, younger mice rapidly, but provided the older mice with improved cognitive functions. So what.
They went on to test it. Old people were given blood transfusions at 6k a pop. How did that go?
You haven't researched it much more, that was almost a decade ago. 2014. So what went wrong? It was taking over from other studies again the research went dark. Stopped. 1930-50s? Something. Then decades later back to it.
Kim Jung Il, right? Supposedly transfused virgin blood regularly. How old did he live for? There have been others transplanting very young organs.
Stemcells, are in treatments, creams, organ transplants, plastic surgery. They are far more effective.
But where there are the claims of increased longevity is manipulating the DNA by editing the genes of the mice. They have lived for around 30% longer.
This cannot be done on humans or you're creating clones, suggestively they can faster be harvested for benefits. Or it's new human beings grown by artifical insemination and embryo manipulation by gene editing. They have done this to some extents. Researching it more in quite a few programs. More is off the grid. Studies not Googled. But claims of.
That tech isn't there yet. To knowledge.
But the blood shit is pretty much myth outside of some vitality benefits. Almost everything else has similar claims of vitality.
Or find what happened to the rest of that linked study? It's been almost a decade 2014, whatever. Same as it did decades ago I'd imagine. The stuff of vampires. Myths and cannibals.
The fundamental problem is if somebody has cracked it. They'd never publicise it. It to my knowledge has not, not by blood, because it has a heap of other problems related on repeated transfusion.
They've started the clones. Unclear how cloned. I think they've almost done it all outside of a surrogate. How cloned, a cloned emybro put into a surrogate and artificially inseminated yes? Except I believe they've done the whole thing artificially. I am shocked it has gone ahead. Not that shocked. Matter of time. Despite everybody else spewing ethics.
https://futureworld.org/mindbullets/worlds-first-cloned-human-turns-14/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eve-first-human-clone/
Because this, .https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50944461
Above probably went off the medical record and got integrated into blacks ops. Who knows.
One way or another?
https://www.embl.org/news/lab-matters/human-genome-editing-regulations-risks-and-ethical-considerations/
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/four-us-crispr-trials-editing-human-dna-for-new-medical-treatments-180973029/
Back to the blood. Yawn. The above is there. Its implications are far worse.
Whatever retard. That stupid down vote. Because you needed to prove what topically? You linked shit regarding a 2014 study. How far did those transfusions go? The human trials. Did they stop aging? What are you down voting?
Instead like a generic monkey. You haven't understood me. Because you needed a myth of vampirism?
Here are synthetic mice being grown https://www.cam.ac.uk/stories/model-embryo-from-stem-cells
Here is mice anti aging
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/nov/28/scientists-reverse-ageing-mice-humans
Outside of the above. Here is where that tech is https://interestingengineering.com/science/anti-aging-30-years
It's also relatively easy to synthesize, negating the need to "torture babies."