a) what if arguing (reasoning against others) represents wasted effort (resistance vs resistance) for ones resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death)?
b) winning vs losing...the conflict remains no matter which side one chooses.
c) look at the majority of humanity and tell me what they ever "won" through reasoning?
shared on closed
a) what if ones consent to a closed environment (internet) shapes it wide open for those suggesting it?
b) consenting to suggested online tempts one to behave inline aka consenting to suggested progressivism tempts one to follow directions of others.
Meanwhile in reality...being (life) inline (inception towards death) implies resistance within direction.
leaked documents
DOCU (direction) MENT (mind; memory)...what if ones consent allows the suggestions of others to leak into ones mind/memory for misdirection?
Look at that link, it's laughably a low tier report. If it is indeed genuine. An online newspaper bulletin for which classification. The local community. The stuff a janitor finds clogging the toilet.
How is it verified? Quick, take a few units off the slider bar for the next report, when a Battalion of armor is destroyed in the Tank War. Please mark it with an X.
Authorise more funding for another Tank brigade, immediately.
How has it verified, allies. If they're operating in special forces?
Don't worry we just mark our own. Very important risk factor. The Ranger battalion has been marked on the map. Clearly they need the cover.
We know how many rounds they have, they keep asking for more. It's now hooked into the military phone, it keeps a record. They're connected to the data sharing, providing the causality rate. We fit them with the microchips. Beep beep.
If enemy bombs are dropped draw a map, it is uploaded to the data sharing.
There is nothing inside of it apart from conjecture and speculation. On a changing battlefield. Next week need a better headline guys. The Bakhmut brigades have fallen. Please move the slider back and reform them into the next cluster.
It looks like the stuff a computer game is made out of. How are any audits made? Who uploaded it to Pentagon? Clearly it handles all the data sharing. Did the Ukraines upload their body cams, using the new apple watches, daily munition rates are fully tagged. The new apple watches are very clever, how many trenches dug. The dog tag activity is in GPS. Did the Satellite images, it has identified and complied a glossary?
I am curious how the weekly newspaper for the top secrets is compiled with the little icons and glossary of its detailed appendix for the weekly risk assessment, any janitors found in the toilet? It contained the entire Natopian encyclopedia. I think those are very inclusive icons, with the special forces on them. Look at that tank. What model is that? Very diverse. They're completely Nato inclusive.
a) what if arguing (reasoning against others) represents wasted effort (resistance vs resistance) for ones resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death)?
b) winning vs losing...the conflict remains no matter which side one chooses.
c) look at the majority of humanity and tell me what they ever "won" through reasoning?
a) what if ones consent to a closed environment (internet) shapes it wide open for those suggesting it?
b) consenting to suggested online tempts one to behave inline aka consenting to suggested progressivism tempts one to follow directions of others.
Meanwhile in reality...being (life) inline (inception towards death) implies resistance within direction.
DOCU (direction) MENT (mind; memory)...what if ones consent allows the suggestions of others to leak into ones mind/memory for misdirection?
Fuck off idiot. Put that into a dictionary.
Look at that link, it's laughably a low tier report. If it is indeed genuine. An online newspaper bulletin for which classification. The local community. The stuff a janitor finds clogging the toilet.
How is it verified? Quick, take a few units off the slider bar for the next report, when a Battalion of armor is destroyed in the Tank War. Please mark it with an X.
Authorise more funding for another Tank brigade, immediately.
How has it verified, allies. If they're operating in special forces?
Don't worry we just mark our own. Very important risk factor. The Ranger battalion has been marked on the map. Clearly they need the cover.
We know how many rounds they have, they keep asking for more. It's now hooked into the military phone, it keeps a record. They're connected to the data sharing, providing the causality rate. We fit them with the microchips. Beep beep.
If enemy bombs are dropped draw a map, it is uploaded to the data sharing.
There is nothing inside of it apart from conjecture and speculation. On a changing battlefield. Next week need a better headline guys. The Bakhmut brigades have fallen. Please move the slider back and reform them into the next cluster.
It looks like the stuff a computer game is made out of. How are any audits made? Who uploaded it to Pentagon? Clearly it handles all the data sharing. Did the Ukraines upload their body cams, using the new apple watches, daily munition rates are fully tagged. The new apple watches are very clever, how many trenches dug. The dog tag activity is in GPS. Did the Satellite images, it has identified and complied a glossary?
I am curious how the weekly newspaper for the top secrets is compiled with the little icons and glossary of its detailed appendix for the weekly risk assessment, any janitors found in the toilet? It contained the entire Natopian encyclopedia. I think those are very inclusive icons, with the special forces on them. Look at that tank. What model is that? Very diverse. They're completely Nato inclusive.
My consent would chain me to that suggestion, while tempting me to ignore that everything within nature is apart from one another.
Inclusive implies being within, so how could anything within be "complete"?
How does partial (special) get into momentum (force)?