No. It isn't. If it was purposefully funnelled misinformation for a narrative.
No sooner does it want to police and sanction discord and other crosslinked platforms and games.
These have been in the media repeatedly as a way of creating opposing networks and sending code.
As far as it went. None of that information is all in one place, and in one glossary. Why would it take the time to detail all of it in that manner. It would become lower tier, despite its supposed seal, access needing a sketch, speculation, for lower clearance, needing what is this word, an encyclopedia. Making it a hoax. Propaganda for a dumb public needing a dumb narrative where they're policed or who cares or knows. There would be far more specific reports. Audits. These are for oversight committees, and senior staff, where that access if very specific, and request precise clarity. Not all of those eggs are in one basket. It compromises its integrity. It compartmentalises subjectively.
Those appendages in it are speculation. Changing daily. However they detail enough truth to cause a reaction. What is it for and what does it cause.
NARRATE, verb - "to relate the particulars of any event or transaction" or "to write, as the particulars of a story or history"
What if nature relates (produces) each partial (life) by dividing whole (inception towards death)? What if this internal division of whole (loss) into partials (growth) represents an ongoing transaction aka the transmutation of action into reaction?
What if the suggested narratives (information) of others tempt one to ignore perceivable narration (inspiration)?
What if one represents IN (within) FORM (formed by) -ATION (through action), which implies IN (within) SPIRIT (spiro; to breathe) -ATION (through action).
What if form (life) has to adapt (spirit) to flow (inception towards death) to sustain self...and what if other form can tempt one to ignore that?
to cause a reaction
Does the suggested information by others "cause" ones reaction? If one chooses to ignore the suggested information by others, then did one ignore "cause"?
If ones free will of choice represents effect (reaction); then what represents cause?
Maybe it makes for gamers
GAME, noun - "in antiquity, games were public diversions or contests exhibited as spectacles for the gratification of the people"...what if privately suggested information represents the public diversion and reasoning among the public about it represents the contest?
No. It isn't. If it was purposefully funnelled misinformation for a narrative.
No sooner does it want to police and sanction discord and other crosslinked platforms and games.
These have been in the media repeatedly as a way of creating opposing networks and sending code.
As far as it went. None of that information is all in one place, and in one glossary. Why would it take the time to detail all of it in that manner. It would become lower tier, despite its supposed seal, access needing a sketch, speculation, for lower clearance, needing what is this word, an encyclopedia. Making it a hoax. Propaganda for a dumb public needing a dumb narrative where they're policed or who cares or knows. There would be far more specific reports. Audits. These are for oversight committees, and senior staff, where that access if very specific, and request precise clarity. Not all of those eggs are in one basket. It compromises its integrity. It compartmentalises subjectively.
Those appendages in it are speculation. Changing daily. However they detail enough truth to cause a reaction. What is it for and what does it cause.
Convince me otherwise? I'd laugh if I saw that? https://archive.fo/gZ8Dx
Look at it. Look at all the little doodles. Guys why does it put icons on the baby report? What computer game is this? I swear it is risk.
Tank needs tank icon. Which tank, all same icon? That not an Abrams look at that tank. I'm sorry. Too much bullshit. Maybe it makes for gamers
What if nature relates (produces) each partial (life) by dividing whole (inception towards death)? What if this internal division of whole (loss) into partials (growth) represents an ongoing transaction aka the transmutation of action into reaction?
What if the suggested narratives (information) of others tempt one to ignore perceivable narration (inspiration)?
What if one represents IN (within) FORM (formed by) -ATION (through action), which implies IN (within) SPIRIT (spiro; to breathe) -ATION (through action).
What if form (life) has to adapt (spirit) to flow (inception towards death) to sustain self...and what if other form can tempt one to ignore that?
Does the suggested information by others "cause" ones reaction? If one chooses to ignore the suggested information by others, then did one ignore "cause"?
If ones free will of choice represents effect (reaction); then what represents cause?
GAME, noun - "in antiquity, games were public diversions or contests exhibited as spectacles for the gratification of the people"...what if privately suggested information represents the public diversion and reasoning among the public about it represents the contest?