No. It isn't. If it was purposefully funnelled misinformation for a narrative.
No sooner does it want to police and sanction discord and other crosslinked platforms and games.
These have been in the media repeatedly as a way of creating opposing networks and sending code.
As far as it went. None of that information is all in one place, and in one glossary. Why would it take the time to detail all of it in that manner. It would become lower tier, despite its supposed seal, access needing a sketch, speculation, for lower clearance, needing what is this word, an encyclopedia. Making it a hoax. Propaganda for a dumb public needing a dumb narrative where they're policed or who cares or knows. There would be far more specific reports. Audits. These are for oversight committees, and senior staff, where that access if very specific, and request precise clarity. Not all of those eggs are in one basket. It compromises its integrity. It compartmentalises subjectively.
Those appendages in it are speculation. Changing daily. However they detail enough truth to cause a reaction. What is it for and what does it cause.
NARRATE, verb - "to relate the particulars of any event or transaction" or "to write, as the particulars of a story or history"
What if nature relates (produces) each partial (life) by dividing whole (inception towards death)? What if this internal division of whole (loss) into partials (growth) represents an ongoing transaction aka the transmutation of action into reaction?
What if the suggested narratives (information) of others tempt one to ignore perceivable narration (inspiration)?
What if one represents IN (within) FORM (formed by) -ATION (through action), which implies IN (within) SPIRIT (spiro; to breathe) -ATION (through action).
What if form (life) has to adapt (spirit) to flow (inception towards death) to sustain self...and what if other form can tempt one to ignore that?
to cause a reaction
Does the suggested information by others "cause" ones reaction? If one chooses to ignore the suggested information by others, then did one ignore "cause"?
If ones free will of choice represents effect (reaction); then what represents cause?
Maybe it makes for gamers
GAME, noun - "in antiquity, games were public diversions or contests exhibited as spectacles for the gratification of the people"...what if privately suggested information represents the public diversion and reasoning among the public about it represents the contest?
a) what if arguing (reasoning against others) represents wasted effort (resistance vs resistance) for ones resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death)?
b) winning vs losing...the conflict remains no matter which side one chooses.
c) look at the majority of humanity and tell me what they ever "won" through reasoning?
shared on closed
a) what if ones consent to a closed environment (internet) shapes it wide open for those suggesting it?
b) consenting to suggested online tempts one to behave inline aka consenting to suggested progressivism tempts one to follow directions of others.
Meanwhile in reality...being (life) inline (inception towards death) implies resistance within direction.
leaked documents
DOCU (direction) MENT (mind; memory)...what if ones consent allows the suggestions of others to leak into ones mind/memory for misdirection?
Look at that link, it's laughably a low tier report. If it is indeed genuine. An online newspaper bulletin for which classification. The local community. The stuff a janitor finds clogging the toilet.
How is it verified? Quick, take a few units off the slider bar for the next report, when a Battalion of armor is destroyed in the Tank War. Please mark it with an X.
Authorise more funding for another Tank brigade, immediately.
How has it verified, allies. If they're operating in special forces?
Don't worry we just mark our own. Very important risk factor. The Ranger battalion has been marked on the map. Clearly they need the cover.
We know how many rounds they have, they keep asking for more. It's now hooked into the military phone, it keeps a record. They're connected to the data sharing, providing the causality rate. We fit them with the microchips. Beep beep.
If enemy bombs are dropped draw a map, it is uploaded to the data sharing.
There is nothing inside of it apart from conjecture and speculation. On a changing battlefield. Next week need a better headline guys. The Bakhmut brigades have fallen. Please move the slider back and reform them into the next cluster.
It looks like the stuff a computer game is made out of. How are any audits made? Who uploaded it to Pentagon? Clearly it handles all the data sharing. Did the Ukraines upload their body cams, using the new apple watches, daily munition rates are fully tagged. The new apple watches are very clever, how many trenches dug. The dog tag activity is in GPS. Did the Satellite images, it has identified and complied a glossary?
I am curious how the weekly newspaper for the top secrets is compiled with the little icons and glossary of its detailed appendix for the weekly risk assessment, any janitors found in the toilet? It contained the entire Natopian encyclopedia. I think those are very inclusive icons, with the special forces on them. Look at that tank. What model is that? Very diverse. They're completely Nato inclusive.
No. It isn't. If it was purposefully funnelled misinformation for a narrative.
No sooner does it want to police and sanction discord and other crosslinked platforms and games.
These have been in the media repeatedly as a way of creating opposing networks and sending code.
As far as it went. None of that information is all in one place, and in one glossary. Why would it take the time to detail all of it in that manner. It would become lower tier, despite its supposed seal, access needing a sketch, speculation, for lower clearance, needing what is this word, an encyclopedia. Making it a hoax. Propaganda for a dumb public needing a dumb narrative where they're policed or who cares or knows. There would be far more specific reports. Audits. These are for oversight committees, and senior staff, where that access if very specific, and request precise clarity. Not all of those eggs are in one basket. It compromises its integrity. It compartmentalises subjectively.
Those appendages in it are speculation. Changing daily. However they detail enough truth to cause a reaction. What is it for and what does it cause.
Convince me otherwise? I'd laugh if I saw that? https://archive.fo/gZ8Dx
Look at it. Look at all the little doodles. Guys why does it put icons on the baby report? What computer game is this? I swear it is risk.
Tank needs tank icon. Which tank, all same icon? That not an Abrams look at that tank. I'm sorry. Too much bullshit. Maybe it makes for gamers
What if nature relates (produces) each partial (life) by dividing whole (inception towards death)? What if this internal division of whole (loss) into partials (growth) represents an ongoing transaction aka the transmutation of action into reaction?
What if the suggested narratives (information) of others tempt one to ignore perceivable narration (inspiration)?
What if one represents IN (within) FORM (formed by) -ATION (through action), which implies IN (within) SPIRIT (spiro; to breathe) -ATION (through action).
What if form (life) has to adapt (spirit) to flow (inception towards death) to sustain self...and what if other form can tempt one to ignore that?
Does the suggested information by others "cause" ones reaction? If one chooses to ignore the suggested information by others, then did one ignore "cause"?
If ones free will of choice represents effect (reaction); then what represents cause?
GAME, noun - "in antiquity, games were public diversions or contests exhibited as spectacles for the gratification of the people"...what if privately suggested information represents the public diversion and reasoning among the public about it represents the contest?
I heard this theory a week ago but about 4chan. Everything about this “leak” is controlled.
a) what if arguing (reasoning against others) represents wasted effort (resistance vs resistance) for ones resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death)?
b) winning vs losing...the conflict remains no matter which side one chooses.
c) look at the majority of humanity and tell me what they ever "won" through reasoning?
a) what if ones consent to a closed environment (internet) shapes it wide open for those suggesting it?
b) consenting to suggested online tempts one to behave inline aka consenting to suggested progressivism tempts one to follow directions of others.
Meanwhile in reality...being (life) inline (inception towards death) implies resistance within direction.
DOCU (direction) MENT (mind; memory)...what if ones consent allows the suggestions of others to leak into ones mind/memory for misdirection?
Fuck off idiot. Put that into a dictionary.
Look at that link, it's laughably a low tier report. If it is indeed genuine. An online newspaper bulletin for which classification. The local community. The stuff a janitor finds clogging the toilet.
How is it verified? Quick, take a few units off the slider bar for the next report, when a Battalion of armor is destroyed in the Tank War. Please mark it with an X.
Authorise more funding for another Tank brigade, immediately.
How has it verified, allies. If they're operating in special forces?
Don't worry we just mark our own. Very important risk factor. The Ranger battalion has been marked on the map. Clearly they need the cover.
We know how many rounds they have, they keep asking for more. It's now hooked into the military phone, it keeps a record. They're connected to the data sharing, providing the causality rate. We fit them with the microchips. Beep beep.
If enemy bombs are dropped draw a map, it is uploaded to the data sharing.
There is nothing inside of it apart from conjecture and speculation. On a changing battlefield. Next week need a better headline guys. The Bakhmut brigades have fallen. Please move the slider back and reform them into the next cluster.
It looks like the stuff a computer game is made out of. How are any audits made? Who uploaded it to Pentagon? Clearly it handles all the data sharing. Did the Ukraines upload their body cams, using the new apple watches, daily munition rates are fully tagged. The new apple watches are very clever, how many trenches dug. The dog tag activity is in GPS. Did the Satellite images, it has identified and complied a glossary?
I am curious how the weekly newspaper for the top secrets is compiled with the little icons and glossary of its detailed appendix for the weekly risk assessment, any janitors found in the toilet? It contained the entire Natopian encyclopedia. I think those are very inclusive icons, with the special forces on them. Look at that tank. What model is that? Very diverse. They're completely Nato inclusive.
My consent would chain me to that suggestion, while tempting me to ignore that everything within nature is apart from one another.
Inclusive implies being within, so how could anything within be "complete"?
How does partial (special) get into momentum (force)?
Which one of you commenting here isn't ChatGPT.
BTW, not "man-children", just "idiot scum". "Man child" is kind of like a term of endearment for the generation of worthless trash.