yep. I asked it basic questions about improving gas mileage on a specific year/engine and it gave incorrect answer.
it refused to answer speculative questions like how did Vince Foster commit suicide in the middle of Fort Marcy Park without getting dirt on the bottom of his shoes. It called me a conspiracy theorist. fucking epic.
the "AI" is programmed it to use Common Crawl Project as it's "search engine"
I haven't had time to dig into that monstrosity yet, but you can bet is just a fake news aggregator. I'm not sure there's a way around it.
Seems to me this so-called AI is not allowed to learn from its interactions with humans but only parrot lefty talking points if finds on Common Crawl.
of all the "AI's" that have existed, this one is the least "intelligent"
https://files.catbox.moe/w35vyo.jpg
It's like putting someone in a lab coat to make them appear official. Call it AI, and most will assume it only gives correct answers
yep. I asked it basic questions about improving gas mileage on a specific year/engine and it gave incorrect answer.
it refused to answer speculative questions like how did Vince Foster commit suicide in the middle of Fort Marcy Park without getting dirt on the bottom of his shoes. It called me a conspiracy theorist. fucking epic.
LOL it calls you names? Does it call you a bigot? hahahha this AI is probably just some fat purple haired dyke typing messages with a cat on her lap.
agreed. its like snopes on HRT mega doses.
exactly
Just like Google, or Wikipedia, or snopes
Now we must all submit to the "knowledge" of "artificial intelligence"
LOL
I think you are right. Another false authority on truth meant to replace GOD.
here it uses the term "data I was trained on"
grammatically speaking this means training is past tense - no more learning.
https://files.catbox.moe/1wsppz.jpg
"My data sources include a diverse range..."
Yep. Jew propaganda. "Diverse" LOL
The validity of a data base has nothing to do with how "diverse" its collection sources were. Diversity is not even objectively measured.