Since when did this occur?
(www.bbc.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
Except those are the UK statistics. Approx 1 in 7, on the NHS website. Again the NHS website has tricksy wording. Around 17% reportedly. Do these apply for IVFs because they're incapable. No. They're inflated numbers based on? An average.
But when we rewind to 2015 in other global statistics that figure is tiny. Insignificant.
If we look at the fertility rates and population births. I wonder. Some I've linked.
I don't trust the BBC much. The WHO less.
There is tricksy wording. Couples not conceiving in 12 months via unprotected intercourse??? Umm umm.
The fact is it was just published 2023 and it is speculative as a Global figure.
Look at the 2015 figure.
The BBC is a pile of. Especially recently. But I can link at least 20 other outlets publicising it. It's the WHO figure.
I think this is a bunch of freaking software. Like COVID infections. It's an average of a few factors. But that increase has certainly increased recently.
Well, what do you know? You actually came up with facts to put me in my place. Perfectly done. Hope everyone follows your example and examines data as you do.
Still, don't trust bbc fear propaganda, as they have a lot of it. None of their data can be verified due to the reasons they list. Have that in mind only.
I fkin love real arguments! Keep them coming in posts and comments. This place needs this!
It's absolutely remarkable. Shocking. But something is very wrong there. Comparing previous data.
Who knows.
Thanks.
Thing is, the NHS is less trustworthy than the BBC. Why would you believe anything that any ZOG organization tells you?
Then why post their data and pretend you believe it?
Use your retard brain. Because it is a global source. I could link American and at least 20 press outlets with it.
I don't trust the data it's this new pandemic planner crap.
Prior look read the link 2015. Almost as good a global indicator. Verified provider. Less than 50 million couples globally, it was average but it was probably more statistical. So what went wrong. Suddenly you're talking worse than cancer stats. The wording is completely speculative. Have they been diagnosed as impotent. No it doesn't even claim that. Does it. Begging the questions of if it's just couples not conceiving????
Combined into a lessening lack of birthrates. These peaked in COVID.
So you trust the science in this? All the data is accurate and properly presented?