Homosexuality has. Transgender has not. Yes in intercourse there is being and getting fucked. It translated into crossdressing. Largely to entice victims, or simply negate that guilt. As it tried to be femine or masculine. For various reasons regarding intercourse and outside of intercourse. But it was not Trans. An artifical change assuming another gender when it was not. There have been enunchs. Castration. Again their lifespan was decreased by huge margins.
There are no natural transgenders in mammals. There is an anomaly, a defect in nature at hundreds of million to 1. Where there are presumed two set of organs, or controversial organs, very large clits and very small dicks, or man boobs, and hairy women. But that biology could still reproduce naturally having wombs and balls despite of anomalies.
Trans has not existed until medicine usurped an artifical change citing an anomaly at hundreds of millions to one. Until almost no transgenders currently have it. No transgenders the majority at staggering margins, have that defect. It really did not exist. Because despite of the supposed chromosomes, or defect two sets of organs, they were still their birthed biology.
Homosexuality exists because of choice. Mammals are vastly bisexual. More so in restricted environments. Domestically far more. In the wild where habitat becomes constrained or tampered with, bisexuality occurs more frequently. Otherwise there are no homosexual mammals, just bisexuals. In humans similar but from experience and choice we base our preferences, until becoming a habit. Children aren't born sexualized. They have no experience. How do they gain their preferences. Who honestly cares. They can fuck what they want humanely. The blame game thinks it's due to being born homosexual. No they had no experience, then they gained hormones, it brought about preferences and fetishes and experiences.
I am straight. Edgy topic.
I am not writing a thesis here in any event to a rather abrupt response. It would be wrong because medicine and conditioning can manipulate it. In any event. Sooner with A.I, can force it. This has been experimented with for decades. Until it is becoming programmed. Look at that shit in those schools. Cannibals giving candy. Medicine. It can even force queer animals, it can tamper with hormones, through diet or medicine, restrict habitat. Create an abundance of choice sexualizing. At the end of the day, who cares until it intrudes. Until it becomes so perverse it simply is not appropriate or dignified. But it is championed as it invades.
But your argument is totally wrong, transgenders have not existed until recently. Until they could completely change skin, invasively. Crossdressers have. Whatever the sexual, political, or generational reasons. But it did not make them trans. An anomaly in nature where despite of it, the natural biology could in most cases, reproduce. Most, as in some people cannot reproduce at all, womb or balls are completely incapable. Whatever their chromosomes can. The organs by defect, could. Trans is a defect in nature. A defect so ridiculously small, it doesn't exist in a majority. Until giving a child candy. Simply to cannibalise a majority into you tell me. A destructive trend that cannot naturally reproduce, but it thinks to assume the same status?
Homosexuality has. Transgender has not. Yes in intercourse there is being and getting fucked. It translated into crossdressing. Largely to entice victims, or simply negate that guilt. As it tried to be femine or masculine. For various reasons regarding intercourse and outside of intercourse. But it was not Trans. An artifical change assuming another gender when it was not. There have been enunchs. Castration. Again their lifespan was decreased by huge margins.
There are no natural transgenders in mammals. There is an anomaly, a defect in nature at hundreds of million to 1. Where there are presumed two set of organs, or controversial organs, very large clits and very small dicks, or man boobs, and hairy women. But that biology could still reproduce naturally having wombs and balls despite of anomalies.
Trans has not existed until medicine usurped an artifical change citing an anomaly at hundreds of millions to one. Until almost no transgenders currently have it. No transgenders the majority at staggering margins, have that defect. It really did not exist. Because despite of the supposed chromosomes, or defect two sets of organs, they were still their birthed biology.
Homosexuality exists because of choice. Mammals are vastly bisexual. More so in restricted environments. Domestically far more. In the wild where habitat becomes constrained or tampered with, bisexuality occurs more frequently. Otherwise there are no homosexual mammals, just bisexuals. In humans similar but from experience and choice we base our preferences, until becoming a habit. Children aren't born sexualized. They have no experience. How do they gain their preferences. Who honestly cares. They can fuck what they want humanely. The blame game thinks it's due to being born homosexual. No they had no experience, then they gained hormones, it brought about preferences and fetishes and experiences.
I am straight. Edgy topic.
I am not writing a thesis here in any event to a rather abrupt response. It would be wrong because medicine and conditioning can manipulate it. In any event. Sooner with A.I, can force it. This has been experimented with for decades. Until it is becoming programmed. Look at that shit in those schools. Cannibals giving candy. Medicine. It can even force queer animals, it can tamper with hormones, through diet or medicine, restrict habitat. Create an abundance of choice sexualizing. At the end of the day, who cares until it intrudes. Until it becomes so perverse it simply is not appropriate or dignified. But it is championed as it invades.
But your argument is totally wrong, transgenders have not existed until recently. Until they could completely change skin, invasively. Crossdressers have. Whatever the sexual, political, or generational reasons. But it did not make them trans. An anomaly in nature where despite of it, the natural biology could in most cases, reproduce. Most, as in some people cannot reproduce at all, womb or balls are completely incapable. Whatever their chromosomes can. The organs by defect, could. Trans is a defect in nature. A defect so ridiculously small, it doesn't exist in a majority. Until giving a child candy. Simply to cannibalise a majority into you tell me. A destructive trend that cannot naturally reproduce, but it thinks to assume the same status?