Hi Vlad. i know you are on our side so I am taking the time to respond.
I have posted about 6 million times on this board about this Holohoax.
I cannot summarise the way the trick works but it all has to do with language and assumptions. So, ask yourself: "How do I know what I am led to believe I know".
Language is twisted to change definitions to suit agendas. Look at the CPI for example and how TPTB say inflation is not really an issue. This is because they changed the items in the CPI compared to the 70s and 80s.
And so it goes.
However, you are lucky bcause there are some excellent researchers who have done the work for us.
I will give you link to those videos for you to watch and it will all become clear to you. Since you are on this forum i know you have thinking capacity. However, the major disadvantage of all these narrators is that they talk like they talk to medical professionals assuming the audience understands them. I do, but even with my background knowledge I had to rerun the videos multiple times and also read the reference papers.
This video of Tim Truth (and the last few) are montage of professionals who took the time to make videos about this hoax. I just watched it.
The biggest secret is around minute 23:22 of this video. Please go there and listen until minute 25:00...Whoever understands what is said here has the entire secret unveiled. But again the narrators just pass it as it is common knowledge. Trust me, it is not ! If you do know of a medical professional please ask them about what is said here.
Dr Sam Bailey another medical professional has been making videos about it. Please check her past ones.
Thank you. You gave me some material to review tonight. Gonna roll a cigar and watch it later.
I'm watching your first suggested video through right now. So far I do find it intriguing. Specifically that to this day they have not isolated the supposed Covid virus. Also, Dr. Tom Cowan explains a viral infection testing method that sounds far more complicated and tedious than I would have guessed. I have read explanations of the PCR test being unreliable in the past, but the testing procedures are far more suspect than I understood previously.
I'd like to see this guy Dr. Tom Cowan in a civil debate with a doctor who argues for the conventional theories on virology and germ theory. And frankly, intellectual debate is what should be going on in universities. It should be the best minds challenging everything people assume to be true. Instead we just get force fed indoctrination and censorship and expulsion of anyone challenging established lies.
When I see a visual representation of a virus, it appears to be a whole unit and not a 20% fragment.
When someone is sick, specimens show high concentrations of viral load. Although one may not be able to prove a virus causes illness, it is certainly peculiar that when someone is ill with a "viral infection" they have large quantities of this virus present. There is a high, positive correlation at the very least.
What specifically in Virus Mania or about terrain theory was so convincing that you abandoned the formal conventional explanation for germ theory and definitions of a virus?
Terrain theory fails to convince me. People of shared terrain do not all become sick. However, there is more evidence of contagiousness through person to person contact.
I have heard evidence that was interesting. For example, I have heard of studies that attempted to infect people via viral load and contamination and failed to do so.
When someone is sick, specimens show high concentrations of viral load.
Unfortunately, this isn't true. They've never done the experiments to verify this. They might occasionally lie about having done said experiments. The experiments would be cheap and easy to do... they just don't do them.
However, there is more evidence of contagiousness through person to person contact.
Unfortunately, there is no evidence of person to person contagion, at least not scientifically speaking. Anecdotally... sure. But no experiments have ever established contagion. Again... they'll lie about this, but when you go through the papers, you'll see the lie.
Since you've seen through the holofrost, understanding that viruses are a hoax should be fairly easy. Remember, when you try to talk to a normie about the holofrost, their initial impression is that 'the amazing jewish historians must have an answer to all of your objections...' ... but they don't.
Oh cool, the Flat Earth crowd is finally abandoning that tack and now it's "there's no such thing as germs".
I'll reiterate, I'm fully willing to accept that germ theory isn't complete or accurate. Go ahead and provide some evidence, or a competing theory. But your "arguments" are shit.
All you've said, any of you, amounts to "anyone who believes in viruses is a shill normie loser" and "watch a bunch of youtube videos that I'm credulous enough to be fooled by". I don't doubt that you'll be spamming all sorts of sensationalist tripe on these boars over the next few weeks.
I'll consider this idea seriously when you (personally, not a link to some video) can put forward a theory of illness that explains everything that germ theory doespluseverything that you claim germ theory fails to explain.
Until then, Ima assume you're just here to poison the well for good faith conspiracy theorists.
I also trust that you have read the entirety of WHO's Conceptual zero draft for the consideration of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body at its third meeting and you agree with its proposals since you are an avid supporter of viruses.
Get on a call with me and I will let you know. Talking is faster.
What's your phone number? I am confident after talking to you I will be able to convince you that at least SARS-CoV-2 is a virtual only non-physical entity.
It's going to take more than a simple definition.
I'd start with a history lesson how conventional germ theory came to be. When was a virus first discovered? By who?
We see a virus under electron microscope. If not a virus, then what is it?
Perhaps the phony covid tests are only checking for leftover dead cell fragments, but a virus can be seen and exists. So what do you claim it is?
Hi Vlad. i know you are on our side so I am taking the time to respond.
I have posted about 6 million times on this board about this Holohoax.
I cannot summarise the way the trick works but it all has to do with language and assumptions. So, ask yourself: "How do I know what I am led to believe I know".
Language is twisted to change definitions to suit agendas. Look at the CPI for example and how TPTB say inflation is not really an issue. This is because they changed the items in the CPI compared to the 70s and 80s.
And so it goes.
However, you are lucky bcause there are some excellent researchers who have done the work for us.
I will give you link to those videos for you to watch and it will all become clear to you. Since you are on this forum i know you have thinking capacity. However, the major disadvantage of all these narrators is that they talk like they talk to medical professionals assuming the audience understands them. I do, but even with my background knowledge I had to rerun the videos multiple times and also read the reference papers.
This video of Tim Truth (and the last few) are montage of professionals who took the time to make videos about this hoax. I just watched it.
The biggest secret is around minute 23:22 of this video. Please go there and listen until minute 25:00...Whoever understands what is said here has the entire secret unveiled. But again the narrators just pass it as it is common knowledge. Trust me, it is not ! If you do know of a medical professional please ask them about what is said here.
Dr Sam Bailey another medical professional has been making videos about it. Please check her past ones.
Here is one more https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Virus-Mania:5a and another one https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Covid-19:a57 (and yes her accent is horrible and hard to understand but gets bitter after a while !)
Remember everything is in the words and language. They are hiding the truth in plain sight.
Thank you. You gave me some material to review tonight. Gonna roll a cigar and watch it later.
I'm watching your first suggested video through right now. So far I do find it intriguing. Specifically that to this day they have not isolated the supposed Covid virus. Also, Dr. Tom Cowan explains a viral infection testing method that sounds far more complicated and tedious than I would have guessed. I have read explanations of the PCR test being unreliable in the past, but the testing procedures are far more suspect than I understood previously.
I'd like to see this guy Dr. Tom Cowan in a civil debate with a doctor who argues for the conventional theories on virology and germ theory. And frankly, intellectual debate is what should be going on in universities. It should be the best minds challenging everything people assume to be true. Instead we just get force fed indoctrination and censorship and expulsion of anyone challenging established lies.
Thanks and feel free to ask questions if anything is unclear.
I want to be challenged by anyone so i can learn more (the more they ask me the more I dig) but on very specific questions, not generalisations.
This is the jew propaganda i was fed about AIDS, vaccines, germ theory https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16amU1poVl/weirdo-jew-aids-propaganda/c
When I see a visual representation of a virus, it appears to be a whole unit and not a 20% fragment.
When someone is sick, specimens show high concentrations of viral load. Although one may not be able to prove a virus causes illness, it is certainly peculiar that when someone is ill with a "viral infection" they have large quantities of this virus present. There is a high, positive correlation at the very least.
What specifically in Virus Mania or about terrain theory was so convincing that you abandoned the formal conventional explanation for germ theory and definitions of a virus?
Terrain theory fails to convince me. People of shared terrain do not all become sick. However, there is more evidence of contagiousness through person to person contact.
I have heard evidence that was interesting. For example, I have heard of studies that attempted to infect people via viral load and contamination and failed to do so.
I am fairly open to changing my mind based on new evidence or else existing evidence I am currently unaware of.
That's why I have engaged in dialogue with you and asked questions out of curiosity.
Thanks. I will actually find the two books recommended and take the time to study them.
Nope, it's electron microscopy in most cases.
I mean they do colour it, so maybe it is fake?
Unfortunately, this isn't true. They've never done the experiments to verify this. They might occasionally lie about having done said experiments. The experiments would be cheap and easy to do... they just don't do them.
Unfortunately, there is no evidence of person to person contagion, at least not scientifically speaking. Anecdotally... sure. But no experiments have ever established contagion. Again... they'll lie about this, but when you go through the papers, you'll see the lie.
Since you've seen through the holofrost, understanding that viruses are a hoax should be fairly easy. Remember, when you try to talk to a normie about the holofrost, their initial impression is that 'the amazing jewish historians must have an answer to all of your objections...' ... but they don't.
Hi Boomer. I have the pdfs of the early "virology" works from 1911. Do you need any?
Oh cool, the Flat Earth crowd is finally abandoning that tack and now it's "there's no such thing as germs".
I'll reiterate, I'm fully willing to accept that germ theory isn't complete or accurate. Go ahead and provide some evidence, or a competing theory. But your "arguments" are shit.
All you've said, any of you, amounts to "anyone who believes in viruses is a shill normie loser" and "watch a bunch of youtube videos that I'm credulous enough to be fooled by". I don't doubt that you'll be spamming all sorts of sensationalist tripe on these boars over the next few weeks.
I'll consider this idea seriously when you (personally, not a link to some video) can put forward a theory of illness that explains everything that germ theory does plus everything that you claim germ theory fails to explain.
Until then, Ima assume you're just here to poison the well for good faith conspiracy theorists.
Exactly, that's why I didn't even read the rest of your comment, let alone write a paper in response.
Still waiting for your phone number so I can call you and explain in person.
I also trust that you have read the entirety of WHO's Conceptual zero draft for the consideration of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body at its third meeting and you agree with its proposals since you are an avid supporter of viruses.
Do you think I have time to type?
Get on a call with me and I will let you know. Talking is faster.
What's your phone number? I am confident after talking to you I will be able to convince you that at least SARS-CoV-2 is a virtual only non-physical entity.
This is an experiment that the team of Bailey/Cowan/Kaufman proposed re proving the existence of virus.
Have a read and tell us your scientific objections please.
https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/
Happy to debate on scientific grounds with you.
Hard agree, also hard on
also do you have Lanks's experiment that he did and wrote (but not published in a peer-review journal) last year?