Umm. Military use civilian assets all the time and they can even roster them into service, seizing assets. Who knows who cares? They are contracted and funded to extents and clauses within the Ukraine. Why is it a conspiracy? When in fact it is providing coverage in active war zone. A war zone subjected to jammers and communication outages where sat phones and uplinks provide another means of communication as lines and power grids are disrupted. But does it make any satellites a target?
Besides the conspiracy is although it was privately developed for remote access, in most locations covered, who are its main contractors? Think you'll find military and other branches of government had been using it more? Outside of bigger corporations.
Who gave the satellites their permission? The Government gave permission and therefore was in all probability using them first? Funding came from.
Is this why all calls for how they are blocking the night sky and obstructing space observation and any other concerns have been ignored, but even more are offering coverage.
Not necessarily at all. War could be coming perhaps. Not enough to measure it from Starlink.
Starlink who uses remote access? Sat phones or uplinks in Antarctica, a desert, the jungle, a mountain, or needs that connection and away from local providers and coverage?
Look at that list? No wonder it was immediately contracted to the Ukraine. First major contract and it's the military. Why was that? Because it was already, right, to the USA military and perhaps its other Allies?
War incoming, perhaps, let me know when they capture something else, non military funded.
A bigger Mandela effect is all the crappy sources flipping out because Russia is stationing nukes in Belarus. This has been a source of crap over the last few days. Somehow this already happened last year. At the start of the conflict they were stationed in Kaliningrad and Belarus had the S400-500. But if memory serves Belarus already hosted Russian nukes, it has always hosted Russian nukes? Does anybody remember this. How many times last year deployment was announced or even threatened. Last week nothing but nonsense repeating what was already possibly there for much longer? Nuclear Bombers were there? Kaliningrad definitely had the latest arsenal. Belarus the S400-500. Didn't it also have nukes?
Soooo, not Musk, but the deep state. Thanks for the gay headline
Umm. Military use civilian assets all the time and they can even roster them into service, seizing assets. Who knows who cares? They are contracted and funded to extents and clauses within the Ukraine. Why is it a conspiracy? When in fact it is providing coverage in active war zone. A war zone subjected to jammers and communication outages where sat phones and uplinks provide another means of communication as lines and power grids are disrupted. But does it make any satellites a target?
Besides the conspiracy is although it was privately developed for remote access, in most locations covered, who are its main contractors? Think you'll find military and other branches of government had been using it more? Outside of bigger corporations.
IFF this is true, then we are already well under way into a war economy where Government dictates what is manufactured by private corporations.
Hahaha. Hahaha. Hahaha.
Who gave the satellites their permission? The Government gave permission and therefore was in all probability using them first? Funding came from.
Is this why all calls for how they are blocking the night sky and obstructing space observation and any other concerns have been ignored, but even more are offering coverage.
Don't be naive.
Sure, that's how it goes.
But this is the reason that will be used to control also OTHER (non-gov funded, non-deep-state-puppet) companies.
War is coming...
Not necessarily at all. War could be coming perhaps. Not enough to measure it from Starlink.
Starlink who uses remote access? Sat phones or uplinks in Antarctica, a desert, the jungle, a mountain, or needs that connection and away from local providers and coverage?
Look at that list? No wonder it was immediately contracted to the Ukraine. First major contract and it's the military. Why was that? Because it was already, right, to the USA military and perhaps its other Allies?
War incoming, perhaps, let me know when they capture something else, non military funded.
A bigger Mandela effect is all the crappy sources flipping out because Russia is stationing nukes in Belarus. This has been a source of crap over the last few days. Somehow this already happened last year. At the start of the conflict they were stationed in Kaliningrad and Belarus had the S400-500. But if memory serves Belarus already hosted Russian nukes, it has always hosted Russian nukes? Does anybody remember this. How many times last year deployment was announced or even threatened. Last week nothing but nonsense repeating what was already possibly there for much longer? Nuclear Bombers were there? Kaliningrad definitely had the latest arsenal. Belarus the S400-500. Didn't it also have nukes?
Yawn. I swear. Nothing but repetition today.
We're almost there. Wait until the Communists start burning the White House.