thanks for your controlled oppo service tucker!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
To what end? So that we all go to prison? Or you think this will force a combat when they come to haul us away? Or they'll miraculously rewrite the laws and we'll be exonerated...
The correct solution is to attack them, yes. To dethrone them. But we won't because the cost is death.
If the process of dying generates the living, then the cost of death sets the price of life...
a) "free" will of choice implies confinement within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom...free (living) within dom (process of dying).
b) consenting (belief; creed; credit) to suggested currency (flow) puts one into debt (debitum, contracted), hence choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law. That represents the prison of the consenting many to the suggestions of the chosen ones.
Only perceivable nature sets every perceiving one within "free" (will of choice)...
There are ways to avoid taxes. Rich jews avoid them.
a) aware about suggested "aren't" (are nothing) representing a contradiction in terms.
b) aware about that their consenting choice to suggested GUESS, verb - "conjecture; without means of knowledge" represents ones means (choice) within perceivable (balance).
In short...nature sets apart (perceivable whole into perceiving partial); other tempt with suggested "conjecture" to throw back together, hence ignoring nature.
Can one (life) avoid way (inception towards death)?
a) are those who suggest money inside the conflict of reason (poor vs rich) among those consenting to money?
b) M-ONE-Y aka MY ONE...an ownership claim over another.
c) POOR, adjective [Latin pauper.] - "wholly destitute of property, or not having property sufficient for a comfortable subsistence; needy"...a sleight of hand for those who ignore perceivable "need" for suggested "want".