There is not enough shareholders voting in coordination to overrule whatever Larry Fink's agenda is. He, or someone else at Blackrock, gets to decide what to do with all the proxy votes of their fund holders.
I can't believe that the average boomer fund holder wants corporations to engage in so much gay, or race, advertising and corporate policy. It doesn't make any sense from any business model, because it doesn't make money.
I don't even think it would be possible for 4chan to start voting out CEOs at woke corporations through the power of meme magic.
LOL yeah right
Let's just start with basics.
On average, what percent of shareholders do you think vote on issues?
And who gets to decide what shareholders get to vote on?
There is not enough shareholders voting in coordination to overrule whatever Larry Fink's agenda is. He, or someone else at Blackrock, gets to decide what to do with all the proxy votes of their fund holders.
I can't believe that the average boomer fund holder wants corporations to engage in so much gay, or race, advertising and corporate policy. It doesn't make any sense from any business model, because it doesn't make money.
I don't even think it would be possible for 4chan to start voting out CEOs at woke corporations through the power of meme magic.
Thank you. Some logic in this forum