This felt like anon bait to me. The idea that the scientist got it wrong but this guy on the internet used planetary alignments to predict it. All of this precludes any other type of man made explanation.
Which I don’t necessarily want to rule out…
You know why physicists reject that thinking? Because those alignments don’t exert an uneven force on the earth…
The diameter of the earth is INSANELY small compared to the distances at play here.
The effect of any gravitational pull from a distance celestial body will be essentially the same on every part of the planet because of this.
And the idea that the gravitational pull triggered this is silly… since if that was enough to do it… you’d see the moon triggering earthquakes on a regular basis.
Controlled opposition like Jack Posobiec (imho) pushed the alignment explanation… making me suspicious.
I know lots of people here think space is bullshit and so is "dark matter" or whatever it is they want to call it.
But if we can believe the thousands of people who have dedicated their entire lives to looking through a telescope.
Galaxy's are in a flow, like they are being drawn down a river. This was one of the big reasons they needed dark matter to explain what was causing this movement. I also find it strange how the shape seems to mimic the structures of neurons.
Galactic clusters and filaments are surrounded by voids that contain very little matter. Altogether, the cosmic web looks somewhat like a human brain. To be more precise, the distribution of matter in the universe looks a little like the “connectome,” the network of nerve connections in the human brain.
It makes me think again of, as above, so below. Or even multiple dimensions. What if we are just some tiny little atom in some other being. While also having self contained universe's in us as well. Maybe not, but the math does say its possible.
Anyway, your right the forces by themselves are tiny, but when everything is aligned I am sure its possible that these forces exert stresses across this planet. The moon and other planets have quakes and they are much more geographically stable than earth. For example, the moon and mars dont even have a magnetic core.
Wasnt there a guy in r/con who was predicting earthquakes with a pretty good accuracy?
Anyway, for a complete picture, we still need to know where planet 9 is coming from.
Likely from the same trajectory that the Oumuamua object came from, or backwards. So its either approaching from the top or the bottom.
There is something that the news didnt really touch on about this object.
Alternatively, a more exotic scenario is that ‘Oumuamua may be a fully operational probe sent intentionally to Earth vicinity by an alien civilization. Based on the PAN-STARRS1 survey characteristics, and assuming natural origins following random trajectories, Do et al. (2018) derived that the interstellar number density of ‘Oumuamua-like objects should be extremely high, ∼ 2 × 1015 pc−3, equivalent to ∼ 1015 ejectedplanetisimals per star, and a factor of 100 to 108 larger than predicted by theoretical models (Moro-Martin et al. 2009). This discrepancy is readily solved if ‘Oumuamua does not follow a random trajectory but is rather a targeted probe. Interestingly, ‘Oumuamua’s entry velocity is found to be extremely close to the velocity of the Local Standard of Rest, in a kinematic region that is occupied by less than 1 to 500 stars.
Now anything is possible, including this just being some strange kind of rock... but the fact that it was basically sitting at local standard rest is interesting. The chances of that happening naturally are extremely rare.
As soon as we passed it, it does a gravity swing and starts accelerating away with no means of propulsion like outgasing.
In another interview, this harvard guys says the first thing he thought of was a buoy on the ocean.....
I’m not convinced he predicted anything.
This felt like anon bait to me. The idea that the scientist got it wrong but this guy on the internet used planetary alignments to predict it. All of this precludes any other type of man made explanation.
Which I don’t necessarily want to rule out…
You know why physicists reject that thinking? Because those alignments don’t exert an uneven force on the earth…
The diameter of the earth is INSANELY small compared to the distances at play here.
The effect of any gravitational pull from a distance celestial body will be essentially the same on every part of the planet because of this.
And the idea that the gravitational pull triggered this is silly… since if that was enough to do it… you’d see the moon triggering earthquakes on a regular basis.
Controlled opposition like Jack Posobiec (imho) pushed the alignment explanation… making me suspicious.
Not gravity, electromagnetism. This has a much stronger force and reach. Look into Electric Universe theory.
Magnetism has exponentially less reach than gravity (inverse distance cubed vs inverse distance squared).
I know lots of people here think space is bullshit and so is "dark matter" or whatever it is they want to call it.
But if we can believe the thousands of people who have dedicated their entire lives to looking through a telescope.
Galaxy's are in a flow, like they are being drawn down a river. This was one of the big reasons they needed dark matter to explain what was causing this movement. I also find it strange how the shape seems to mimic the structures of neurons.
It makes me think again of, as above, so below. Or even multiple dimensions. What if we are just some tiny little atom in some other being. While also having self contained universe's in us as well. Maybe not, but the math does say its possible.
Anyway, your right the forces by themselves are tiny, but when everything is aligned I am sure its possible that these forces exert stresses across this planet. The moon and other planets have quakes and they are much more geographically stable than earth. For example, the moon and mars dont even have a magnetic core.
Wasnt there a guy in r/con who was predicting earthquakes with a pretty good accuracy?
Anyway, for a complete picture, we still need to know where planet 9 is coming from.
Likely from the same trajectory that the Oumuamua object came from, or backwards. So its either approaching from the top or the bottom.
There is something that the news didnt really touch on about this object.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.11490.pdf
Now anything is possible, including this just being some strange kind of rock... but the fact that it was basically sitting at local standard rest is interesting. The chances of that happening naturally are extremely rare.
As soon as we passed it, it does a gravity swing and starts accelerating away with no means of propulsion like outgasing.
In another interview, this harvard guys says the first thing he thought of was a buoy on the ocean.....
Im on a rant today T_T.
I enjoyed your rant.
It's from observing phonemena produced by not gravity but electro magnetism
Distance planets (assuming they have a moving core) are too far away for their magnetic fields to even impact earth.