Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

12
Who Are They Covering Up For? Supreme Court Says It Is Unable To Identify The Person Who Leaked Draft of Abortion Ruling (archive.is)
posted 2 years ago by Vlad_The_Impaler 2 years ago by Vlad_The_Impaler +14 / -2
6 comments share
6 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (6)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– Primate98 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I was always of the opinion it was leaked by Alito himself. I would content the op (part of the larger Quiet War) was to gauge public opinion, defuse it as an election issue, and was a sort of predictive programming. They got like two days of outrage, 90% of which was driven by non-stop media, so they proceeded with the ruling.

In actuality, the Supreme Court is like the kind of small office many of us had worked in. Nine justice have seven of so clerks each, plus a small administrative staff. Maybe a hundred people, only a small fraction of which would have had access to prepublished opinions.

Just a guess, but I'd say if such an opinion really leaked, it would be instantly narrowed down to no more than three people, if they didn't know who it was right away. Not much of an investigation would ever be needed.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– roadkill77 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

spoiler alert...

it was roberts... another epstien flight list name...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

They are covering for the whole institution, because Ginsberg used to leak material and nobody did anything about it, and Thomas would leak material as well. If they came down hard on this leak, they would have to come down on all of them going forward while being hypocritical about the past.

The Marshalls, who did the investigation, did not have the ability to interrogate under oath, and many of the other stuff feds do (looking at who was talking to what reporters, etc., via wiretapping type of methods). Further, there was very little opsec as they were working remotely.

Lastly, under the legal precedent that SCOTUS itself issued when it made its decision on the leaking of the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam War, it's an open question if a crime was even committed.

These three things combined are why they never found the leaker, and if they had a suspicion over who it was, they didn't arrest them, charge them with 15 different bullshit and tangentially related crimes, and get them to plead to one or cough up who their co-conspirators were.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Effyew 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

It was a planned leak to distract from the ruling itself.

Why now? Why would they do anything to "help" people or support pro-lifers?

They won't. They were removing bodily autonomy and medical privacy precedence on federal / constitutional level for a bad reason.

What were they preparing for?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler [S] 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Fuck the Supreme Court. They're a bunch of frauds.

LegalMan of The Quash podcast rips the supreme court to pieces.

The Quash Legal "precedent" is NOT LAW https://podcastaddict.com/episode/139300392

In this bonus episode I show people that the entire structure of the legal system WE ARE TOLD exists "under the supreme court" is utter nonsense and NOBODY would agree to it and nobody EVER HAS. I thought I would put this out to the public in light of the latest SCT "leak".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Effyew 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Thanks for sharing! He makes some good points.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy