a) CONTRA (against) DICERE (to speak) -TION (through action)...speaking represents different reactions within the same enacting sound. Every word represents inclusive within sound, while every choice to speak represents exclusive to one another.
b) MU'TUAL, adjective [Latin mutuus, from muto, to change.]...life being moved from inception towards death implies being within constant change aka exclusive partial (living) within inclusive whole (process of dying).
three...religions at the same time?
Every RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew) represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law. If each one of the many chooses to consent to the suggestions of the few, then the few become the "chosen ones" aka the ELITE (French élite) - "selection, choice".
Sure they are. Christianity says that Christ is God and the son of God, Islam claims he's only a prophet, and judaism counts him as a liar and false Messiah. There is no way to reconcile those positions, only one can be correct.
RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"...that bond implies ones consent to the suggestion of another one, hence binding oneself to the will of others by willing consent...the claim "my" tempts one to ignore that.
created is separate and distinct
Separated distinction aka partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) implies perceivable transmutation (out of everything)...not suggested creationism (out of nothing).
One (partial) can only be within all (whole) and all represents one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "Internal or inherent power".
Im holding all you sons of bitches hostage. I control everyones lives with the tip of my finger :|.
I dont worship aliens as god for creating me, but I could consider aliens godlike for their ability to create life, the same way sadistic fucks think they are god for controlling who lives and who dies lmao.
In some cultures, the only thing being god means is having tremendous power, usually to destroy.
And believe it or not, some branches of mormons believe that they they can become gods with enough spiritual growth.
"In Mormonism, the concept of divinity centers around an idea of "exaltation" and "eternal progression": mortals themselves may become gods and goddesses in the afterlife, be rulers of their own heavenly kingdoms, have spirit children, and increase in power and glory forever."
Which aligns closely to karmic beliefs which I think are more plausible myself, only because I dream I am different people all the time. Seems to me that we do have spirits that are more than the shells we inhabit.
I believe in much of the same things as you do, and considering that the bible is a collection of older pagan stories, with the important bits stripped out. You have no idea how much I want to believe.
Im not ignorant enough, or proud enough to give that god a name, claim that it looks anything like a human. And that it would sentence you to hell or heaven for one simple act, not believing.
That just sounds like a childs fairy tale if you ask me.
I also hope that some day you realize how ignorant you sound when you try to claim that your one religion, is some how more important or takes precedence over the thousands of religions before this one.
a) A'LIEN, adjective [Latin alienus, from alius, another.]...everyone else represents another for oneself.
b) HOST, noun [Latin hostis, a stranger.]...once again, everyone represents a stranger to one another.
c) obsession (wanting suggested) comes before possession (holding onto suggested).
if...can vs cannot be, then...
a) using implication (if/then) upon reason (can vs cannot) tempts one to ignore that what's being reasoned about was suggested by another. Meanwhile, implication implies perceivable aka if inception, then death for life within.
b) to be implies life being moved from inception towards death...can vs cannot reasoning over suggested tempts one to ignore that.
c) to be implies being able (can) to adapt to everything perceivable...suggested cannot (can nothing) represents the inversion thereof.
Sleight of hand: "can" of worms...don't open it unless you want to bait.
How are you three mutually exclusive religions at the same time? All three have core beliefs that contradict each other.
a) CONTRA (against) DICERE (to speak) -TION (through action)...speaking represents different reactions within the same enacting sound. Every word represents inclusive within sound, while every choice to speak represents exclusive to one another.
b) MU'TUAL, adjective [Latin mutuus, from muto, to change.]...life being moved from inception towards death implies being within constant change aka exclusive partial (living) within inclusive whole (process of dying).
Every RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew) represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law. If each one of the many chooses to consent to the suggestions of the few, then the few become the "chosen ones" aka the ELITE (French élite) - "selection, choice".
Sure they are. Christianity says that Christ is God and the son of God, Islam claims he's only a prophet, and judaism counts him as a liar and false Messiah. There is no way to reconcile those positions, only one can be correct.
So, you're saying Christ isn't God?
RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"...that bond implies ones consent to the suggestion of another one, hence binding oneself to the will of others by willing consent...the claim "my" tempts one to ignore that.
Separated distinction aka partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) implies perceivable transmutation (out of everything)...not suggested creationism (out of nothing).
One (partial) can only be within all (whole) and all represents one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "Internal or inherent power".
Yes you figured it out.
Im holding all you sons of bitches hostage. I control everyones lives with the tip of my finger :|.
I dont worship aliens as god for creating me, but I could consider aliens godlike for their ability to create life, the same way sadistic fucks think they are god for controlling who lives and who dies lmao.
In some cultures, the only thing being god means is having tremendous power, usually to destroy.
And believe it or not, some branches of mormons believe that they they can become gods with enough spiritual growth.
Which aligns closely to karmic beliefs which I think are more plausible myself, only because I dream I am different people all the time. Seems to me that we do have spirits that are more than the shells we inhabit.
I believe in much of the same things as you do, and considering that the bible is a collection of older pagan stories, with the important bits stripped out. You have no idea how much I want to believe.
Im not ignorant enough, or proud enough to give that god a name, claim that it looks anything like a human. And that it would sentence you to hell or heaven for one simple act, not believing.
That just sounds like a childs fairy tale if you ask me.
I also hope that some day you realize how ignorant you sound when you try to claim that your one religion, is some how more important or takes precedence over the thousands of religions before this one.
Laughable really.
Interplanetary aliens don’t exist. The idea is just a distraction to consume normies.
"The Flesh"
How about a dream
a) A'LIEN, adjective [Latin alienus, from alius, another.]...everyone else represents another for oneself.
b) HOST, noun [Latin hostis, a stranger.]...once again, everyone represents a stranger to one another.
c) obsession (wanting suggested) comes before possession (holding onto suggested).
a) using implication (if/then) upon reason (can vs cannot) tempts one to ignore that what's being reasoned about was suggested by another. Meanwhile, implication implies perceivable aka if inception, then death for life within.
b) to be implies life being moved from inception towards death...can vs cannot reasoning over suggested tempts one to ignore that.
c) to be implies being able (can) to adapt to everything perceivable...suggested cannot (can nothing) represents the inversion thereof.
Sleight of hand: "can" of worms...don't open it unless you want to bait.