But nobody is completely suicidal, when their population is at stake. Nukes going off, where. They haven't yet. On that basis are still unlikely. A last resort. If a tactical strike occurs. What indeed is that response. Suicide I think not, despite the fact they ultimately will again, and easier. Tricksy button to press. Why it hasn't. Besides any support sooner wavers if indeed they're released. While counter support faster rallies.
The only way there is a 70% reduction in population is if nukes are involved.
Not in any documented pandemic, collapse. It takes a disaster, of existential proportion, or historically war to cause that drop.
Anybody can make predictions. But it hasn't got statistical math generating it. Despite the greater risk of a larger conflict, or the use of tactical weapons.
Yes. But survival dictates numbers. Not megalomaniacs. I know these type soldiers, follow orders. Yes that command goes through without question. No matter the odds. They do it with a smile, some wait for this. But will it.
Proable math. Puts a tactical nuke strike high. Especially on jets and long range missiles deploying and further conflict. Russia cannot be pushed back without a larger war occurring. If indeed they use them. No plans currently, but an increasing concern, and with rogues, and more entering. Very tricky position now. Retaliate with nukes becomes suicide. But those odds have to gauge will it go there regardless if not retaliation. Odds on use increases with use. What retaliation? If not nukes a bigger conflict can occur anyway as more enter. They will on any strike. So the talk is hard and the support harder. But math still holds it in restraint, and could on that kind of strike, even after occurrence. It is not Cuba, it is worse today in some ways, not much wiggle room, and it's a hot conflict, and still adjusting. But there are also other agendas and politics. Although like Cuba can yield, find ground, but when there are much wider geopolitics perhaps some things will break first. It isn't just Ukraine the factor. Nations arm, and others will, others seek agenda, others want stability.
However for this topic's imminent prediction, it takes math and it isn't near to it. Near as it's in a deciding postion, still posturing. But that posture isn't suicide. Never was. It's largely political and territorial. And still carving up gain and agenda. Suddenly if indeed, it isn't localised to Europe or the Americas either.
None of their articles are related to timed events. None of their articles have posted dates, and I'm having trouble finding an actual owner for that site.
that happens to populations when nukes go off
But nobody is completely suicidal, when their population is at stake. Nukes going off, where. They haven't yet. On that basis are still unlikely. A last resort. If a tactical strike occurs. What indeed is that response. Suicide I think not, despite the fact they ultimately will again, and easier. Tricksy button to press. Why it hasn't. Besides any support sooner wavers if indeed they're released. While counter support faster rallies.
The only way there is a 70% reduction in population is if nukes are involved.
Not in any documented pandemic, collapse. It takes a disaster, of existential proportion, or historically war to cause that drop.
Anybody can make predictions. But it hasn't got statistical math generating it. Despite the greater risk of a larger conflict, or the use of tactical weapons.
have you met religious weirdos? especially satanic ones? they are very suicidal and will kill "for the cause" no matter the consequences...
we're dealing with people who trade their own children like animals
Yes. But survival dictates numbers. Not megalomaniacs. I know these type soldiers, follow orders. Yes that command goes through without question. No matter the odds. They do it with a smile, some wait for this. But will it.
Proable math. Puts a tactical nuke strike high. Especially on jets and long range missiles deploying and further conflict. Russia cannot be pushed back without a larger war occurring. If indeed they use them. No plans currently, but an increasing concern, and with rogues, and more entering. Very tricky position now. Retaliate with nukes becomes suicide. But those odds have to gauge will it go there regardless if not retaliation. Odds on use increases with use. What retaliation? If not nukes a bigger conflict can occur anyway as more enter. They will on any strike. So the talk is hard and the support harder. But math still holds it in restraint, and could on that kind of strike, even after occurrence. It is not Cuba, it is worse today in some ways, not much wiggle room, and it's a hot conflict, and still adjusting. But there are also other agendas and politics. Although like Cuba can yield, find ground, but when there are much wider geopolitics perhaps some things will break first. It isn't just Ukraine the factor. Nations arm, and others will, others seek agenda, others want stability.
However for this topic's imminent prediction, it takes math and it isn't near to it. Near as it's in a deciding postion, still posturing. But that posture isn't suicide. Never was. It's largely political and territorial. And still carving up gain and agenda. Suddenly if indeed, it isn't localised to Europe or the Americas either.
Fiction. It sells.
that's only two years off. Maybe I should cancel my lifetime subscription to Reader's Digest.
Not the same Daegel:
https://www.corbettreport.com/but-what-about-deagel-questions-for-corbett-video/
None of their articles are related to timed events. None of their articles have posted dates, and I'm having trouble finding an actual owner for that site.
And yet they have 1800 articles?
Here is my favorite from the last page:
Who’s in Charge? by Jeff Thomas
Let me know if you find a single article that has anything to actually say.
Wayback machine is showing it to be a former launch pad for gambling and other basic services. Though it has existed since 2011? Weird.
http://web.archive.org/web/20110902085452/http://internationalman.com/
😭
BuT mUh SpOrTsBaLl.
Please do. Start with me
George Floyd got what he deserved.