I always remember this interview segment from Fahrenheit 9/11. That was back when Michael Moore produced something of value. 9/11, itself, is what first got me into conspiracy research (aside from the silly stuff I listened to on the art bell coast to coast a.m. radio show as a teenager), but I think we, at least my generation, have to give some credit to Michael Moore, because that documentary got a lot of normies interested in 9/11 conspiracies, since most normies would have never stumbled upon Loose Change or any of the other stuff we all watched.
I bet if you ask DemoKKKrats if Trump would kill 3,000 of his own citizens, they'd say yes.
Therefore, it's only naive zionist "muh chosens peoples" patriotic "muh flag muh anthem" Republicans who believe the government would never kill 3,000 of its own people.
His job is to politicize important news stories and prevent the public from unifying.
He follows a formula… important story followed by some wedge issue social piece that half the country will hate.
People “feel” satisfied…as if the issue they care about finally saw the light of day… but in reality he just neutralized it.
Think about how it played out with the truckers, for example… they had real momentum and positivity and everyone assumed going on Tucker was a good thing.
But that’s when the left decided they absolutely hated these people. He triggers their tribal programming, and purposefully so.
And as he does this, he crowds out independent journalists and prevents them from gaining larger audiences.
Just a mouthpiece.
I always remember this interview segment from Fahrenheit 9/11. That was back when Michael Moore produced something of value. 9/11, itself, is what first got me into conspiracy research (aside from the silly stuff I listened to on the art bell coast to coast a.m. radio show as a teenager), but I think we, at least my generation, have to give some credit to Michael Moore, because that documentary got a lot of normies interested in 9/11 conspiracies, since most normies would have never stumbled upon Loose Change or any of the other stuff we all watched.
a) suggesting right vs wrong conflict of reason over suggested moralism.
b) giving notice of liability for "injury through speaking" (blaspheme).
c) suggesting transgression (sin) within consented to moralism.
lotta words .. lotta projection lol. ala tucker
a) Only the natural order (inception towards death) throws forward; while everyone within represents resistance (life).
b) Nature does not throw forward suggested "words", it throws forward perceivable "sound".
AKA "in the manner of", from MAN'NER, noun - "form", which tempts one to ignore being form (life) out of flow (inception towards death).
i meant tucker projecting.. not I haha
Context?
What is year of this interview and what were they discussing?
this was in the 2000s.. he was interviewing the founder of "architechs for 9/11 truth"
they were discussing.. (drumroll) 9/11
Interesting.
I bet if you ask DemoKKKrats if Trump would kill 3,000 of his own citizens, they'd say yes.
Therefore, it's only naive zionist "muh chosens peoples" patriotic "muh flag muh anthem" Republicans who believe the government would never kill 3,000 of its own people.
Do you actually think you're saying something when you post or do you just cross your fingers and hope whatever stupid shit you just typed made sense?
You could never defeat me in an intellectual debate on any subject.
You're outwitted and out muscled.
What do you resort to now?
Look at what you just wrote.
His job is to politicize important news stories and prevent the public from unifying.
He follows a formula… important story followed by some wedge issue social piece that half the country will hate.
People “feel” satisfied…as if the issue they care about finally saw the light of day… but in reality he just neutralized it.
Think about how it played out with the truckers, for example… they had real momentum and positivity and everyone assumed going on Tucker was a good thing.
But that’s when the left decided they absolutely hated these people. He triggers their tribal programming, and purposefully so.
And as he does this, he crowds out independent journalists and prevents them from gaining larger audiences.
You fucking nailed that shit dude.
Thank you for your kind words.
i just like how his water carriers never question his motives...
"hey.. how come you stopped talking about hunters laptop?"
"hey... where were you such a neocon war hawk in the 2000s?"
"do you work for the CIA? .. whats this picture of you in iraq with an AK47?"