Yeah, the low probability stuff is what they're down to.
So many people have been wondering why Russia hasn't moved more aggressively to put an end to it, especially with this "winter offensive". I finally figured it out tonight, a literal shower thought.
They're demilitarizing NATO itself. Ukraine is burning through decades worth of NATO munitions in fruitless advances, and expending tremendous effort to transport vehicles and artillery to Russia's doorstep where they can blow it all to pieces. When you step back, the plan is simplicity itself.
But step 3 is already commencing (same network, different side of the pond):
New insanely big public spending on military, re-armament, domestic weapons production, money printing, re-shoring of industrial production, etc.
This is already in the process in the US (new monster budget for 2024 for re-stocking military), in GER, FRA, even Japan is doing it.
It is part of the "Let's keep the NATO / USD / Petrodollar / "wester liberalism" charade going for another few years.
I don't think "the west" (a misnomer, but let's use it) is oblivious to the fact of the drawdown of the stock, or mincemeating 500 000 Ukrainians.
It's part of the plan, just step 2 in the operation.
Remember, they always plan 5 steps ahead (minimum) with branching off points, alt-scenarios, contingencies and sensitivity analyses to different options.
While most are still reacting to step 1, they have already planned out 5 steps and are preparings steps 2-5.
Otherwise I agree wholeheartedly with what you wrote.
Well, that's always the question, isn't it? The answer, I would say, depends on the size of the lens.
To me, the current conflict traces back at least as far as the Tartarians and the Napoleonic Wars, and continues on through the 1800s with a giant load of erased and rewritten history.
How much of this does the Russian leadership know? I'd be shocked if it wasn't way more than me. One thing I've learned in the last year, though, is that Russians play their cards extremely close to the vest.
Ultimately, I feel certain that it must trace back to the Anunnaki and Satan but so much history has been hidden and distorted I don't have anything concrete to offer along those lines. However, when I hear stuff like this, I do not consider it simply to be "colorful turns of phrase":
Yeah, the low probability stuff is what they're down to.
So many people have been wondering why Russia hasn't moved more aggressively to put an end to it, especially with this "winter offensive". I finally figured it out tonight, a literal shower thought.
They're demilitarizing NATO itself. Ukraine is burning through decades worth of NATO munitions in fruitless advances, and expending tremendous effort to transport vehicles and artillery to Russia's doorstep where they can blow it all to pieces. When you step back, the plan is simplicity itself.
It seems to finally be dawning on them when you see how col their feet are getting: Tanks, No Tanks, Europe Running Dry
I think that is step 2 of the operation.
But step 3 is already commencing (same network, different side of the pond):
New insanely big public spending on military, re-armament, domestic weapons production, money printing, re-shoring of industrial production, etc.
This is already in the process in the US (new monster budget for 2024 for re-stocking military), in GER, FRA, even Japan is doing it.
It is part of the "Let's keep the NATO / USD / Petrodollar / "wester liberalism" charade going for another few years.
I don't think "the west" (a misnomer, but let's use it) is oblivious to the fact of the drawdown of the stock, or mincemeating 500 000 Ukrainians.
It's part of the plan, just step 2 in the operation.
Remember, they always plan 5 steps ahead (minimum) with branching off points, alt-scenarios, contingencies and sensitivity analyses to different options.
While most are still reacting to step 1, they have already planned out 5 steps and are preparings steps 2-5.
Otherwise I agree wholeheartedly with what you wrote.
Well, that's always the question, isn't it? The answer, I would say, depends on the size of the lens.
To me, the current conflict traces back at least as far as the Tartarians and the Napoleonic Wars, and continues on through the 1800s with a giant load of erased and rewritten history.
How much of this does the Russian leadership know? I'd be shocked if it wasn't way more than me. One thing I've learned in the last year, though, is that Russians play their cards extremely close to the vest.
Ultimately, I feel certain that it must trace back to the Anunnaki and Satan but so much history has been hidden and distorted I don't have anything concrete to offer along those lines. However, when I hear stuff like this, I do not consider it simply to be "colorful turns of phrase":
The truth: the MSM has brainwashed people into hating Putin and Russia. Putin is a Christian and called out the NWO as satanists in 2015. Jacob Rothschild called Putin a "traitor to the New World Order."