COCKSUCKER. Read your name. It says you put cock in mouth and suck it. It says you put cock in your ass and coom. Read that gibberish you wrote is like a Cock fucked your earhole and coom on your brain. It has no other thoughts.
In war who are the first people moved from a War zone. Who did Ukraine evacuate first. Such a stupid job they did, if they left even more for Russia to deport. Ukraine didn't evacuate them, Russia is from which territory, Russian. The ones under direct attack and part of Russia.
Take cock out of ear, ass, and mouth. Use brain to talk, read, and think.
How do you speak with Cock in mouth and eardrum. Hell its probably skull fucking you too.
You obviously have no other concept. Rationality, history, geography. Instead there's the media with its cock in your mouth fucking your lil brain.
Border wars are the easiest conflict in history. They have been the cause of almost every war. This is a fact not a debate.
At what point do you not understand history? The simple facts of war.
War has always in modern history evacuated children and women first. Even prior to the elderly. Ukraine did this. Until it stopped allowing women and started conscripting them. In past History children were eaten. They were also beheaded and impaled. In WW1, 14 year olds were soldiers.
So how is Russia, same reason. But why didn't these children leave, if Russia is doing the same, on the cause of almost all conflict, borders. Children in a war zone being evacuated. Not bullshit facts.
Shall we both speculate why they didn't leave, borders, one side say Russia, other side say Ukraine. They didn't leave and are protected by Russia its border claims.
Take cock out of mouth, ears, and ass.
This topic isn't a conspiracy. It's opposing propaganda. I don't buy bullshit. Facts not crap.
I support any effort to evacuate children from a warzone and a threat to their lives.
I think this is the case in an active conflict. A conflict of which there are competing claims to borders, territory, protection, property, and status.
It means emphatically children should be protected from active combat. Otherwise why does anyone fight? Obviously far more reasons then just that. However.
In this case that land historically was granted its status by Russia. What it means today is competing interests and conflict.
You have no argument outside of pathetic musings and propaganda. Factually children should be evacuated and offered haven and protection from war. By those claims towards or claiming territory.
COCKSUCKER. Read your name. It says you put cock in mouth and suck it. It says you put cock in your ass and coom. Read that gibberish you wrote is like a Cock fucked your earhole and coom on your brain. It has no other thoughts.
In war who are the first people moved from a War zone. Who did Ukraine evacuate first. Such a stupid job they did, if they left even more for Russia to deport. Ukraine didn't evacuate them, Russia is from which territory, Russian. The ones under direct attack and part of Russia.
Take cock out of ear, ass, and mouth. Use brain to talk, read, and think.
Invade a country
Abduct its citizens.
Pretend you do it to get them to safety.
How about not fucking invading the country in the first place?
Okay, so NATO shouldn’t have invaded Ukraine, got it.
Good thing then that they haven't
Paid shill confirmed. Eat a dick, kike agent. You’re fooling no one.
How do you speak with Cock in mouth and eardrum. Hell its probably skull fucking you too.
You obviously have no other concept. Rationality, history, geography. Instead there's the media with its cock in your mouth fucking your lil brain.
Border wars are the easiest conflict in history. They have been the cause of almost every war. This is a fact not a debate.
At what point do you not understand history? The simple facts of war.
War has always in modern history evacuated children and women first. Even prior to the elderly. Ukraine did this. Until it stopped allowing women and started conscripting them. In past History children were eaten. They were also beheaded and impaled. In WW1, 14 year olds were soldiers.
So how is Russia, same reason. But why didn't these children leave, if Russia is doing the same, on the cause of almost all conflict, borders. Children in a war zone being evacuated. Not bullshit facts.
Shall we both speculate why they didn't leave, borders, one side say Russia, other side say Ukraine. They didn't leave and are protected by Russia its border claims.
Take cock out of mouth, ears, and ass.
This topic isn't a conspiracy. It's opposing propaganda. I don't buy bullshit. Facts not crap.
Fucking pedo supporter
Coomslurper. What.
I support any effort to evacuate children from a warzone and a threat to their lives.
I think this is the case in an active conflict. A conflict of which there are competing claims to borders, territory, protection, property, and status.
It means emphatically children should be protected from active combat. Otherwise why does anyone fight? Obviously far more reasons then just that. However.
In this case that land historically was granted its status by Russia. What it means today is competing interests and conflict.
You have no argument outside of pathetic musings and propaganda. Factually children should be evacuated and offered haven and protection from war. By those claims towards or claiming territory.