I support any effort to evacuate children from a warzone and a threat to their lives.
I think this is the case in an active conflict. A conflict of which there are competing claims to borders, territory, protection, property, and status.
It means emphatically children should be protected from active combat. Otherwise why does anyone fight? Obviously far more reasons then just that. However.
In this case that land historically was granted its status by Russia. What it means today is competing interests and conflict.
You have no argument outside of pathetic musings and propaganda. Factually children should be evacuated and offered haven and protection from war. By those claims towards or claiming territory.
Fucking pedo supporter
Coomslurper. What.
I support any effort to evacuate children from a warzone and a threat to their lives.
I think this is the case in an active conflict. A conflict of which there are competing claims to borders, territory, protection, property, and status.
It means emphatically children should be protected from active combat. Otherwise why does anyone fight? Obviously far more reasons then just that. However.
In this case that land historically was granted its status by Russia. What it means today is competing interests and conflict.
You have no argument outside of pathetic musings and propaganda. Factually children should be evacuated and offered haven and protection from war. By those claims towards or claiming territory.