Playing With Baals
(www.openbible.info)
Comments (4)
sorted by:
I know the vast majority will reject this, but if you're looking for a clue to correctly understanding of the Bible, in almost every usage Baal is referring to Satan.
And if anyone is going to ask for a link to some Biblical authority saying, "Hey guise, Baal = Satan, m'kay?", I can tell you it does not exist. More work is required and you have to be willing to disagree with all "authorities".
People always act like everything is always sewn up, but it rarely actually is though.
I think all of the names are to throw us off from the fact that they are just run-of-the-mill asshole satanists, or maybe they use that as an excuse for being a murderous pedo?
I've been wondering this for a very long time, is there any actual physical proof that Balls or Satan or Moloch, call him what you will here in this Subbacultcha, exists at all or are they just working with a book and some "faith" as well? Satanism always came off as counter-intelligence to me for some reason.
Frankly, I would probably think exactly the same thing. The logic is consistent enough and the pattern of deception is right on brand.
Except the way it worked for me was that, over a few years I had collected lots of disparate pieces of evidence seemingly related but forming no coherent picture. Finally, I stumbled across a key piece and everything fell into place, like pieces in a kaleidoscope forming an unmistakable image.
I was finally looking through the telescope from the right end. Over the years since then, I've collected perhaps a couple of thousand pieces of evidence consistent with and expanding on that original framework, and failed to find any counter-evidence. Also, I see many things scholars and historians have missed or misinterpreted. They seem plain to me, not because I'm brilliant but simply because--again--they're looking through the wrong end of the telescope.
And I have considered the thought, "What if 'They' are so far ahead that 'They' have planted this evidence (even starting hundreds and thousands of years ago) so that someone like myself would fall into the trap?" If that were the case, They are so far ahead it does not matter what we do. But I'll take the variation of Pascal's Wager and assume it isn't.
Is there physical proof of any of this? Depends on what you mean, and the question actually has less meaning than one might assume. People wave away physical proof all the time (think chemtrails).
As an example, I wonder, "If they're not doing what I think they're doing up on Mt. Graham with their L.U.C.I.F.E.R. instrument (a physical object), then can I reasonably chalk it up to coincidence?"
Final note: When I've happened to come into contact with what satanists and occultists have to say, I've paid very close attention. They're wrong about virtually all their "esoteric" knowledge in those areas where I made my discoveries. I think they're all just given different sets of lies and nonsense, and add their own lies and nonsense to pass on to the unwashed. In a way, they're worse off than the completely ignorant.
One could utilize an understanding of semantics and linguistics involving ancient languages.
Each consonant with meaning, added to the next, with vowels assumed as differentiation.
Ba was an ideation in Egypt (and Ba-baal-on (babylon)) see BeL and BeLiAL.
AL was an ideation
La was an ideation
El was an ideation
Ba-al Ba-el Bealzebub
Baphomat - Ba-pho (phi) maat
Isis Ra El
Now let's try the word 'Satan'.
This work has already been done and awaits discovery.
Even, or most especially those who 'worship satan' or baal also don't know how to 'spell' and so cast it out as 'magic'.