I can't decide if the pair of you are yin and yang or Romeo and Juliet. Perfect character foils, or star-crossed lovers? Either way, ya gotta love it.
In the red corner, there's Skil. Holds the consensus viewpoint when it comes to the shape of Earth, but such a vociferous attacker and so desperately trapped in the paradox of proving how little he cares that he may very well drive people to the other side with his vitriol.
In the blue corner, it's Jack. Though consensus holds his perspective as bunk, he's perhaps the only one here who can maintain his composure. But his hyper-intellectualization and unswerving dedication to terminology leave him adrift within his own community and at odds with both sides of the wider discussion, battling intentional or unwitting psy-operatives on two fronts!
Of course I don’t care. I’ve assembled a list of unanswerable questions for the paid shills, so there’s no point even pretending that they deserve anything other than open contempt and mockery, since they’ll never answer them. There’s no dialogue to be had, and they don’t deserve any genuine response. The only recourse is outright banning of them or… mockery. Simple.
I am a pedant, but i work hard not to be needlessly so! In my view, this is a discussion about science and as such requires semantic precision. I don’t really like it either, but it’s necessary.
Fire and ice, and neither can quit the other.
Lol. I do wonder why i bother. It is impossible to get through to them, and they are so consistently disingenuous that i seriously suspect (even hope) that they are a bot.
I very much enjoyed your accurate descriptions of us, but i think you are giving them too much credit in this analogy. If i am ice, they would be the belligerent senile cursing it.
Slow clap, you two. Excellent stuff.
I can't decide if the pair of you are yin and yang or Romeo and Juliet. Perfect character foils, or star-crossed lovers? Either way, ya gotta love it.
In the red corner, there's Skil. Holds the consensus viewpoint when it comes to the shape of Earth, but such a vociferous attacker and so desperately trapped in the paradox of proving how little he cares that he may very well drive people to the other side with his vitriol.
In the blue corner, it's Jack. Though consensus holds his perspective as bunk, he's perhaps the only one here who can maintain his composure. But his hyper-intellectualization and unswerving dedication to terminology leave him adrift within his own community and at odds with both sides of the wider discussion, battling intentional or unwitting psy-operatives on two fronts!
Fire and ice, and neither can quit the other.
Never change, you two. <3
Of course I don’t care. I’ve assembled a list of unanswerable questions for the paid shills, so there’s no point even pretending that they deserve anything other than open contempt and mockery, since they’ll never answer them. There’s no dialogue to be had, and they don’t deserve any genuine response. The only recourse is outright banning of them or… mockery. Simple.
I am pleased you enjoyed it!
I am a pedant, but i work hard not to be needlessly so! In my view, this is a discussion about science and as such requires semantic precision. I don’t really like it either, but it’s necessary.
Lol. I do wonder why i bother. It is impossible to get through to them, and they are so consistently disingenuous that i seriously suspect (even hope) that they are a bot.
I very much enjoyed your accurate descriptions of us, but i think you are giving them too much credit in this analogy. If i am ice, they would be the belligerent senile cursing it.