Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

64
Simple. (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 2 years ago by Voiyce 2 years ago by Voiyce +65 / -1
19 comments download share
19 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (19)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– friedchicken 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Forget flat earthers, can we ban screenshots without a source or context?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

without a source

a) what if perceivable inspiration represents the only source for every suggested information?

b) what if one (perceiving) exists "within" the source (perceivable), while others tempt one to ignore that for suggested "without"?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– friedchicken 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

We reading tea leaves now?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I mostly use stinging-nettle for tea, so I'm unsure if one can read anything more than "ouch" into them?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Yeah, this is fine for the meme boards, but it would be good to require OP to explain/link screenshots in a comment.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 0 ▼
– Voiyce [S] 0 points 2 years ago +2 / -2

Are you disputing the information or just the way it was presented?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– friedchicken 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

The way it is presented.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– DOOMERSLAYER -3 points 2 years ago +1 / -4

How about both?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

a) the few suggest convenience stores to shape commodities out of inconvenienced buyers by tempting buyers to sell their independence for dependency to the sellers.

b) nature sets "free" will of choice by dividing whole (living) into partial (process of dying)...the only price one pays represents the consequences of ones choices.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– cyberrigger 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Breakfast in the 1960s ---- bacon and eggs (cooked in bacon grease)

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– VanillaBean 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I'm convinced they're going to put mrna shit in the livestock without the people's knowledge or consent, if they haven't already, and there simply won't be enough natural meat to go around, prices will be at a premium, most people won't be able to afford it, most people already can't afford land to hunt, and there won't be a way for the common person to confirm if the meat they do get is genetically natural or not

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

won't be able to afford it

  • AFFO'RD, verb -"to send forth"...to be (life) implies being send forth (inception towards death), hence being enabled by to exist within. "won't" (will not) is being suggested by others to tempt one to ignore being "will" (free will of choice) within "everything" (perceivable).
permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– DOOMERSLAYER -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/healthy_eating/index.html

Really weird that the CDC says nothing like what Op claims.

Any comment on that?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Note how they suggest keeping cholesterol low?

What do eggs and meat have in significant amounts?

The CDC is full of shit anyway. Low fat/low cholesterol diets don't keep you healthy; humans have no problem processong fat. Nutrition isn't hard, your body knows what it needs. As long as you don't eat until you're physically uncomfortable (or train yourself to be comfortable overeating), get a variety of foods (as befits an omnivore) and, for thd love of God, STAY AWAY FROM SUGAR!

Not sure about the states, but Canadian health agencies have a "recommended" daily sugar allotement of 100g. 75g daily is enough to cause obesity and various heart issues and you don't need ANY refined sugar EVER.

Would not be surprised if the CDC had a similar recommendation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy