a) the few suggest convenience stores to shape commodities out of inconvenienced buyers by tempting buyers to sell their independence for dependency to the sellers.
b) nature sets "free" will of choice by dividing whole (living) into partial (process of dying)...the only price one pays represents the consequences of ones choices.
I'm convinced they're going to put mrna shit in the livestock without the people's knowledge or consent, if they haven't already, and there simply won't be enough natural meat to go around, prices will be at a premium, most people won't be able to afford it, most people already can't afford land to hunt, and there won't be a way for the common person to confirm if the meat they do get is genetically natural or not
AFFO'RD, verb -"to send forth"...to be (life) implies being send forth (inception towards death), hence being enabled by to exist within. "won't" (will not) is being suggested by others to tempt one to ignore being "will" (free will of choice) within "everything" (perceivable).
What do eggs and meat have in significant amounts?
The CDC is full of shit anyway. Low fat/low cholesterol diets don't keep you healthy; humans have no problem processong fat. Nutrition isn't hard, your body knows what it needs. As long as you don't eat until you're physically uncomfortable (or train yourself to be comfortable overeating), get a variety of foods (as befits an omnivore) and, for thd love of God, STAY AWAY FROM SUGAR!
Not sure about the states, but Canadian health agencies have a "recommended" daily sugar allotement of 100g. 75g daily is enough to cause obesity and various heart issues and you don't need ANY refined sugar EVER.
Would not be surprised if the CDC had a similar recommendation.
Forget flat earthers, can we ban screenshots without a source or context?
a) what if perceivable inspiration represents the only source for every suggested information?
b) what if one (perceiving) exists "within" the source (perceivable), while others tempt one to ignore that for suggested "without"?
We reading tea leaves now?
I mostly use stinging-nettle for tea, so I'm unsure if one can read anything more than "ouch" into them?
Yeah, this is fine for the meme boards, but it would be good to require OP to explain/link screenshots in a comment.
Are you disputing the information or just the way it was presented?
The way it is presented.
How about both?
a) the few suggest convenience stores to shape commodities out of inconvenienced buyers by tempting buyers to sell their independence for dependency to the sellers.
b) nature sets "free" will of choice by dividing whole (living) into partial (process of dying)...the only price one pays represents the consequences of ones choices.
Breakfast in the 1960s ---- bacon and eggs (cooked in bacon grease)
I'm convinced they're going to put mrna shit in the livestock without the people's knowledge or consent, if they haven't already, and there simply won't be enough natural meat to go around, prices will be at a premium, most people won't be able to afford it, most people already can't afford land to hunt, and there won't be a way for the common person to confirm if the meat they do get is genetically natural or not
https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/healthy_eating/index.html
Really weird that the CDC says nothing like what Op claims.
Any comment on that?
Note how they suggest keeping cholesterol low?
What do eggs and meat have in significant amounts?
The CDC is full of shit anyway. Low fat/low cholesterol diets don't keep you healthy; humans have no problem processong fat. Nutrition isn't hard, your body knows what it needs. As long as you don't eat until you're physically uncomfortable (or train yourself to be comfortable overeating), get a variety of foods (as befits an omnivore) and, for thd love of God, STAY AWAY FROM SUGAR!
Not sure about the states, but Canadian health agencies have a "recommended" daily sugar allotement of 100g. 75g daily is enough to cause obesity and various heart issues and you don't need ANY refined sugar EVER.
Would not be surprised if the CDC had a similar recommendation.