Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

12
identification of possible micro-technology and artificial patterns in pfizer vaccine with optical microscopy (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 2 years ago by glownigger8675309 2 years ago by glownigger8675309 +12 / -0
10 comments download share
10 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (10)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– DZP1 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

There are additional better ways to examine the structures.

  1. a laser microscope can examine the structure of the rectangular objects. I have used a laser microscope to scan micron-sized structures on leading edge semiconductors. However, these are million-dollar machines and not common but use of one might be borrowed in Silicon Valley.
  2. Why not use an electron microscope on these?
permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– wereonit 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

There are many research institutions that charge an hourly rate for the instrument and another rate if you want their technicians to do the work. It is much cheaper than you'd think.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DZP1 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I guess a class of less expensive laser microscopes emerged for 'desktop' use after my time working with the expensive ones. The ones I worked with used complex vibration-isolation means, air bearings, and a lot of control mechanisms, control electronics, and software. These were used by big companies and three-letter agencies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CrazyRussian 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

If you take a random sample from the closest puddle and add some random spice from kitchen along with pinch of dust and bit of table salt, you will get something similar from the drying drop on the glass plate under microscope.

Study is flawed. They didn't even tried figure out exact chemical composition of vaccine to begin with. Then, it is hugely seasoned with statements about some RF stuff while they don't even bother to expose their samples to RF to find out what will happen. It is the same grade of bullshit as studies that showed "efficience" of not-a-vaccines. Both are disgusting mockery of real science.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– cee8hooz 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Maybe yes,maybe not. Assuming however it might be real we shall be ready for worst possibility. And worst possibility is "zombie outbreak"/"the cell" scenario.

Sooner or later those thing with "intra body nanonetworks" or other shit will be applied.Biological robots.It is all about control of "workforce". Meaning us. It is all real research, all what contradicts its usage is information about "state of art" level of this technologies. The fact is however that that could be "black projects".

Consider reading story "Influx" by Daniel Suarez. Fabularized version of reality we live ?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

And worst possibility is "zombie outbreak"

Didn't you notice something around? We already have "zombie outbreak", fortunately, zombies prefer junk food over brains. Supposedly except some with highest rank of them. And there was no need of any visrus or nanotech, I mean directly.

Sooner or later those thing with "intra body nanonetworks" or other shit will be applied.

So, we will have completely new source of energy, some kind of fundamentally new way of data transmission without any wires, RF or light and possibly few more new technologies, potentially closing ones. Taking in account that development of fundamentally new tech is strictly prohibited by NWO, I will assume the probability of developing working "intra body nanonetworks" is somewhere around zero.

The fact is however that that could be "black projects".

Projects could be completely black, but every single time basic technology used in such projects leaked quickly. I doubt they would risk with that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– cee8hooz 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Taking in account that development of fundamentally new tech is strictly prohibited by NWO

Not if those technology serves them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

What fundamentally new tech never existed before was developed since 1970?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– cee8hooz 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

not sure about "never existed" but mostly forgotten and started to be used recently: memristors.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

not sure about "never existed" but mostly forgotten

Memristor was invented (proved mathematically) in 1971. Surprise, surprise! :) Really, some materials that have such properties (changing resistance propertiy after passing some charge through) was known earlier, but nobody cared to study them.

started to be used recently: memristors

Just like that fuel cells, advanced supercapacitors, quantum computers, fusion reactor and so on. Next year wie definitely will have them in production. And that lasts for decades.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy