Gender-neutral God to be considered by Church of England
(www.telegraph.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Nature doesn't brand anything, it moves everything, which those within perceive as inspiration for adaptation, as to sustain themselves.
The few suggest affixed brands to tempt the many to ignore ongoing origin. For example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound), hence being within; by, out of and in response to perceivable sound.
In short...suggested words as an overlay upon perceivable sound represents "spell-craft".
Aka "nothing" and "doing nothing"...how could one thing (perceiving partial) within everything (perceivable whole) perceive "nothing"?
How does perceivable nature communicate "nothing" to you? What if nothing was suggested to you as the inversion of perceivable everything, hence tempting you to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction)?
Would the few have the chutzpah to suggest the many "nothing"? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
EX (expression of) ACT (action) implies being reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying).
a) consenting to suggested or adapting to perceivable...it's a choice.
b) dā-, Proto-Indo-European root meaning "to divide, hence being the divided partial (living) within the dividing aka self differentiating whole (process of dying).
c) da (да) implies versus nyet (Нет) implies a conflict of reason, shaped by ones consent to want to confirm or deny suggested information, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
Hold your breath and contemplate the following..."does it matter if I confirm or deny breathing or will I be forced to adapt anyway?"