Like what we live on? Humanity hasn't explored a majority of the ocean but we went to the moon :) we know little about where we are and what we are. That is the real conspiracy.
of course nasa shot a missle into outer space with the trajectory and timing just right to perform a landing on the moon. what a large amount of variables to get just right. Is that easier more feasible and less resource intensive than diving to the bottom of the ocean, which covers most of the earth and is easily accessible? why not send cameras down there? don't even need humans to man a vessel to do such a task. but we forgot how to go to the moon. hmm. something is fishy about that. It's like the more "advanced" we become, the less we even know.
cost to send artemis to the moon: ~$100 billion total or $4 billion per launch and it is a single use craft.. cost for trieste deep dive submarine: ~$3 million. so going to space is orders of magnitude more expensive... some estimates say it would cost ~3billion to map the entirety of the ocean floor. so we know more about the surface of the moon and mars, but not our own home... way to go sciences! people saying I am a bot is quite cool, and the personal attacks make it quite evident the level of discourse is not more than highschool level.
Like what we live on? Humanity hasn't explored a majority of the ocean but we went to the moon :) we know little about where we are and what we are. That is the real conspiracy.
No...that's the default.
We don't know much about the deep ocean because it's hard to get to.
We know much more about the moon because we can see it with the naked eye.
We don't know hardly anything about the core of the earth, either. That's not a conspiracy; no one's stopping you from jumping into a volcano.
of course nasa shot a missle into outer space with the trajectory and timing just right to perform a landing on the moon. what a large amount of variables to get just right. Is that easier more feasible and less resource intensive than diving to the bottom of the ocean, which covers most of the earth and is easily accessible? why not send cameras down there? don't even need humans to man a vessel to do such a task. but we forgot how to go to the moon. hmm. something is fishy about that. It's like the more "advanced" we become, the less we even know.
Literally yes. You know fucking nothing about astrophysics or oceanography.
Please go to the bottom of the ocean and implode in a femtosecond, crushing your corpse into dust and erasing you from history forever. Please. Do it.
Drink bleach. You’re not even worth being allowed to post here.
Hence why it has happened multiple times with both.
Your point is what, subhuman retard?
Destruction of information is unconscionable. You remain mentally defective and clearly paid to post here.
You must be the most advanced person on earth.
cost to send artemis to the moon: ~$100 billion total or $4 billion per launch and it is a single use craft.. cost for trieste deep dive submarine: ~$3 million. so going to space is orders of magnitude more expensive... some estimates say it would cost ~3billion to map the entirety of the ocean floor. so we know more about the surface of the moon and mars, but not our own home... way to go sciences! people saying I am a bot is quite cool, and the personal attacks make it quite evident the level of discourse is not more than highschool level.