Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

25
The flat earth model can be debunked in minutes using eighth grade geometry and the sunrise heading which should make you question the motives of its supporters (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 2 years ago by Ask_Dave 2 years ago by Ask_Dave +30 / -5
101 comments download share
101 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (101)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

No...that's the default.

We don't know much about the deep ocean because it's hard to get to.

We know much more about the moon because we can see it with the naked eye.

We don't know hardly anything about the core of the earth, either. That's not a conspiracy; no one's stopping you from jumping into a volcano.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– supermario2360 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

of course nasa shot a missle into outer space with the trajectory and timing just right to perform a landing on the moon. what a large amount of variables to get just right. Is that easier more feasible and less resource intensive than diving to the bottom of the ocean, which covers most of the earth and is easily accessible? why not send cameras down there? don't even need humans to man a vessel to do such a task. but we forgot how to go to the moon. hmm. something is fishy about that. It's like the more "advanced" we become, the less we even know.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– TallestSkil 0 points 2 years ago +2 / -2

Is that easier more feasible and less resource intensive than diving to the bottom of the ocean

Literally yes. You know fucking nothing about astrophysics or oceanography.

easily accessible

Please go to the bottom of the ocean and implode in a femtosecond, crushing your corpse into dust and erasing you from history forever. Please. Do it.

why not send cameras down there?

Drink bleach. You’re not even worth being allowed to post here.

don't even need humans to man a vessel to do such a task

Hence why it has happened multiple times with both.

but we forgot how to go to the moon

Your point is what, subhuman retard?

. hmm. something is fishy about that

Destruction of information is unconscionable. You remain mentally defective and clearly paid to post here.

It's like the more "advanced" we become, the less we even know.

You must be the most advanced person on earth.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– supermario2360 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

cost to send artemis to the moon: ~$100 billion total or $4 billion per launch and it is a single use craft.. cost for trieste deep dive submarine: ~$3 million. so going to space is orders of magnitude more expensive... some estimates say it would cost ~3billion to map the entirety of the ocean floor. so we know more about the surface of the moon and mars, but not our own home... way to go sciences! people saying I am a bot is quite cool, and the personal attacks make it quite evident the level of discourse is not more than highschool level.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– HEXEN 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Because you're not bringing anything beyond a middle school analysis to the conversation.

Space is easy. It's a vacuum. There's nothing there. I could throw a ball and it would travel forever. Physics wise, that's easy as shit to work with.

Going to the bottom of the ocean? That's thousands of pounds of pressure per square inch. If you want to see even further, you then have to dig, and that's a MASSIVE can of worms at ocean depths. It's why saturation diving is considered one of the most dangerous jobs in the world.

Honestly, your take on these things is akin to a childs.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy