a) a question represents ones want for outcomes, which others exploit by suggested answers. Consenting to such an answer allows them to direct ones wants through temptation.
b) to beg (asking for charity) tempts one to ignore that all given (process of dying) demands resistance (living) from those within, hence life representing response-ability (free will of choice)...not a charity.
c) if one resists the temptation of suggested answers, then one can question perceivable solution (inspiration), which in return grows ones resistance to want to ask questions, which others will exploit with suggested answers.
How many spells are we still under?
a) you represent the choice to count what others suggest you to count. Perceivable doesn't require those perceiving it to count anything. What one perceives represents moving differences, which implies each "one" of them, which implies "oneself" can only count other "ones".
b) the main spell...suggested spelling (words) over perceivable sound. The later represents ongoing inspiration, the former represents temporary information, used as labels upon ongoing inspiration...motion doesn't require labels to be perceivable, yet those within motion can be tempted with suggested labels to ignore being moved.
Go outside and exercise resisting suggested labels such as tree, wind, earth etc. The more you do, the more you will comprehend about the perceivable motion and the behavior of things being moved and the less will the suggested label stick within your memory.
c) another spell that combines counting and spell-craft (word over sound) represents the suggested "we" (plural) over the perceivable "one" (singular). This is how the few control the many by suggesting each one of them to consent to a suggested group, which then allows the few to direct the entire group (chain of command; order follower; NPC; ideological movements etc.).
d) ones want to understand the suggested information by another represents ones consent to "stand under" another. One isn't under a spell, one willingly consents to utilize suggested words to spell, while willingly ignoring perceivable sound.
One can only exist in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested), hence as choice within balance.
How much of what we perceive to be true is actually founded upon lies dating back hundreds if not thousands of years?
a) ones consent to want (true) or not want (lies) suggested information, tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration, and inspiration implies moving differences, hence constant change...not true or false states.
Try to find any "truth" that others cannot contradict...is there any "truth" that cannot be changed through motion? If you struggle to find any, consider to allow yourself to question if the only thing that cannot change are the rules of change itself (natural law). One needs to discern self (life) as being within motion (inception towards death), to be able to further discern the natural order of motion and the rules of behavior for those within.
Others cannot suggest nature to you without you being tempted to ignore discerning for self.
b) who suggested you to count? Who suggested you to use calendars? Who suggested you dates? Who suggested you exponentially increasing numbers which make your head spin? How does one who exist "now" (within the momentum of motion) perceive centuries and millennia?
On the other hand...does the perceivable "now" offer one the ongoing consequences of what was chosen before as inspiration for adaptation, and would using implication (if/then) help one to discern choices of reaction to sustain self within the moment (um) of now?
c) if you consent to believe in the suggested word "reality", then you put the suggested word "reality" over perceivable reality, while allowing others to define, redefine and contradict the suggested overlay without you realizing it. Fiction represents ones consent to ignore perceivable reality for the suggestions by others.
It's on oneself to discern this. Others cannot penetrate what oneself willingly ignores.
the most important one of all...
a) ...represents "one" self and ones free will of choice to evaluate anything as most or least.
b) import aka IN (being within) PORTO (shelter for vessels within flow) aka being a temporary formed vessel (life) within the shelter (momentum) of ongoing flow (inception towards death).
In short...import (inception) and export (death) of product (life).
The auditors of truth.
a) what truth have the many ever audited that the few aren't continue to redefine and contradict at will?
b) if the many represent the auditors, then why do the few control the debt?
c) AUDIT (Latin audire, from root au-, to perceive)...does one perceive lies or are lies being suggested towards ones consent? If one consents to suggested; then does that imply ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested truth (want) or lies (not want)?
The investigators
a) why do you think the many keep "investing" while only the few keep gaining?
b) the few suggest investment aka IN (being within) VESTIRE (to cloth; cover) MENT (mind; memory), because the consent of the many covers their minds within suggested (information), while ignoring perceivable (inspiration).
The masons of free (will of choice) invest suggested information into the consenting minds/memories of others, hence generating compounded interest, while banking the vessel within flow in-between artificial barriers. Consent of the many is required, hence a Bank & Trust.
the reminders
Hold your son; then remember his birth...while you remember that which was, you're ignoring the son that is. Others suggest reminders (his-story; appointments; nostalgia etc.) to tempt one to remember, while exploiting ones ignorance of that which is...the "now" aka the momentum of motion (balance) for ones free will of choice.
if truth is light than we are carriers of the torch.
Comprehension of perceivable represents "light", ignorance thereof represents "dark"...oneself represents the combustible substance (life) within the combusting essence (inception towards death). Carrying the torch represents sustaining self, which includes passing the torch aka sustaining self by perpetuation (offspring) through another (intercourse).
Those who conspire must be placed inside a stack of tires and retired with fire.
Revenge implies against others, while ignoring to sustain self. Those who ignore to sustain self are being conspired against by others who mercilessly exploit ignorance of perceivable with suggestions.
If one kills all the liars, then the ignorance of others towards the truth will tempt one to sell truth with lies. Ignorance (want) can only be resisted (need), which implies ones free will of choice. Very few comprehend this.
a) a question represents ones want for outcomes, which others exploit by suggested answers. Consenting to such an answer allows them to direct ones wants through temptation.
b) to beg (asking for charity) tempts one to ignore that all given (process of dying) demands resistance (living) from those within, hence life representing response-ability (free will of choice)...not a charity.
c) if one resists the temptation of suggested answers, then one can question perceivable solution (inspiration), which in return grows ones resistance to want to ask questions, which others will exploit with suggested answers.
a) you represent the choice to count what others suggest you to count. Perceivable doesn't require those perceiving it to count anything. What one perceives represents moving differences, which implies each "one" of them, which implies "oneself" can only count other "ones".
b) the main spell...suggested spelling (words) over perceivable sound. The later represents ongoing inspiration, the former represents temporary information, used as labels upon ongoing inspiration...motion doesn't require labels to be perceivable, yet those within motion can be tempted with suggested labels to ignore being moved.
Go outside and exercise resisting suggested labels such as tree, wind, earth etc. The more you do, the more you will comprehend about the perceivable motion and the behavior of things being moved and the less will the suggested label stick within your memory.
c) another spell that combines counting and spell-craft (word over sound) represents the suggested "we" (plural) over the perceivable "one" (singular). This is how the few control the many by suggesting each one of them to consent to a suggested group, which then allows the few to direct the entire group (chain of command; order follower; NPC; ideological movements etc.).
d) ones want to understand the suggested information by another represents ones consent to "stand under" another. One isn't under a spell, one willingly consents to utilize suggested words to spell, while willingly ignoring perceivable sound.
One can only exist in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested), hence as choice within balance.
a) ones consent to want (true) or not want (lies) suggested information, tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration, and inspiration implies moving differences, hence constant change...not true or false states.
Try to find any "truth" that others cannot contradict...is there any "truth" that cannot be changed through motion? If you struggle to find any, consider to allow yourself to question if the only thing that cannot change are the rules of change itself (natural law). One needs to discern self (life) as being within motion (inception towards death), to be able to further discern the natural order of motion and the rules of behavior for those within.
Others cannot suggest nature to you without you being tempted to ignore discerning for self.
b) who suggested you to count? Who suggested you to use calendars? Who suggested you dates? Who suggested you exponentially increasing numbers which make your head spin? How does one who exist "now" (within the momentum of motion) perceive centuries and millennia?
On the other hand...does the perceivable "now" offer one the ongoing consequences of what was chosen before as inspiration for adaptation, and would using implication (if/then) help one to discern choices of reaction to sustain self within the moment (um) of now?
c) if you consent to believe in the suggested word "reality", then you put the suggested word "reality" over perceivable reality, while allowing others to define, redefine and contradict the suggested overlay without you realizing it. Fiction represents ones consent to ignore perceivable reality for the suggestions by others.
It's on oneself to discern this. Others cannot penetrate what oneself willingly ignores.
a) ...represents "one" self and ones free will of choice to evaluate anything as most or least.
b) import aka IN (being within) PORTO (shelter for vessels within flow) aka being a temporary formed vessel (life) within the shelter (momentum) of ongoing flow (inception towards death).
In short...import (inception) and export (death) of product (life).
a) what truth have the many ever audited that the few aren't continue to redefine and contradict at will?
b) if the many represent the auditors, then why do the few control the debt?
c) AUDIT (Latin audire, from root au-, to perceive)...does one perceive lies or are lies being suggested towards ones consent? If one consents to suggested; then does that imply ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested truth (want) or lies (not want)?
a) why do you think the many keep "investing" while only the few keep gaining?
b) the few suggest investment aka IN (being within) VESTIRE (to cloth; cover) MENT (mind; memory), because the consent of the many covers their minds within suggested (information), while ignoring perceivable (inspiration).
The masons of free (will of choice) invest suggested information into the consenting minds/memories of others, hence generating compounded interest, while banking the vessel within flow in-between artificial barriers. Consent of the many is required, hence a Bank & Trust.
Hold your son; then remember his birth...while you remember that which was, you're ignoring the son that is. Others suggest reminders (his-story; appointments; nostalgia etc.) to tempt one to remember, while exploiting ones ignorance of that which is...the "now" aka the momentum of motion (balance) for ones free will of choice.
Comprehension of perceivable represents "light", ignorance thereof represents "dark"...oneself represents the combustible substance (life) within the combusting essence (inception towards death). Carrying the torch represents sustaining self, which includes passing the torch aka sustaining self by perpetuation (offspring) through another (intercourse).
Revenge implies against others, while ignoring to sustain self. Those who ignore to sustain self are being conspired against by others who mercilessly exploit ignorance of perceivable with suggestions.
If one kills all the liars, then the ignorance of others towards the truth will tempt one to sell truth with lies. Ignorance (want) can only be resisted (need), which implies ones free will of choice. Very few comprehend this.