No, the real pole is the center of axis. And the sun is not directly overhead, its over the equator or at least between the tropics. So it would travel in a odd arc.
Yes. I know where the pole is. Now simply visualize the horizontal line in the middle being the track of the sun. And drop it down to the bottom of the planet. That is the path of the sun on a 2D plane.
Why would you even imply the sun is directly overhead? Or the equator, when the topic is the pole? Did you even watch the video?
If the camera is at either pole and the sun is far enough to see, the arc would be flat.
Now lets change the construction of the sentence without losing meaning, placing the results at the beginning.
The arc would be flat, If the sun is far enough to see, and the camera is at either pole.
Do you see any difference between those 2 sentences besides the order they are constructed? Lets look at the individual components of that sentence shall we?
If the camera is at either pole
and the sun is far enough to see,
the arc would be flat.
So, when is the sun not "far enough to see" exactly?
It could be made for a flat plane, or a round plane or a concave plane. I dont know what shape this place is. I am not sure there even is a shape. I dont know how far the sun would have to be to see it. I would bet the what 400000000 miles its supposed to be at would work. (off the top of my head)
I am more interested in the impossible relationship between the sun, moon and earth. And where our history went. What happened to us that we have no real long term memory or the ability to recreate ancient structures. And why does it seem to happen on a regular basis?
No, the real pole is the center of axis. And the sun is not directly overhead, its over the equator or at least between the tropics. So it would travel in a odd arc.
Yes. I know where the pole is. Now simply visualize the horizontal line in the middle being the track of the sun. And drop it down to the bottom of the planet. That is the path of the sun on a 2D plane.
Why would you even imply the sun is directly overhead? Or the equator, when the topic is the pole? Did you even watch the video?
Yes I watched the video.
If the camera is at either pole and the sun is far enough to see, the arc would be flat.
Lets just examine this single statement you made.
Now lets change the construction of the sentence without losing meaning, placing the results at the beginning.
Do you see any difference between those 2 sentences besides the order they are constructed? Lets look at the individual components of that sentence shall we?
So, when is the sun not "far enough to see" exactly?
It could be made for a flat plane, or a round plane or a concave plane. I dont know what shape this place is. I am not sure there even is a shape. I dont know how far the sun would have to be to see it. I would bet the what 400000000 miles its supposed to be at would work. (off the top of my head)
I am more interested in the impossible relationship between the sun, moon and earth. And where our history went. What happened to us that we have no real long term memory or the ability to recreate ancient structures. And why does it seem to happen on a regular basis?