Yes, but what you should see in the above video is the tilt. Not the wobble. As the sun should be cutting across the sky at an angel. Just as it does at the North Pole. So, is the video real?
Fair nuff, depending on time of the year and camera location. You probably see the tilt at your location. The sun doesn't go directly overhead does it?
This place is messed up. There are so many things that dont add up. But even with that belief I am not a FEr
According the the Earth model. You should see the tilt no matter where you are. Please view the earth model in this link and then contrast it to this perfect loop as viewed from the South Pole. Which is an impossibility.
No, the real pole is the center of axis. And the sun is not directly overhead, its over the equator or at least between the tropics. So it would travel in a odd arc.
Yes. I know where the pole is. Now simply visualize the horizontal line in the middle being the track of the sun. And drop it down to the bottom of the planet. That is the path of the sun on a 2D plane.
Why would you even imply the sun is directly overhead? Or the equator, when the topic is the pole? Did you even watch the video?
If the camera is at either pole and the sun is far enough to see, the arc would be flat.
Now lets change the construction of the sentence without losing meaning, placing the results at the beginning.
The arc would be flat, If the sun is far enough to see, and the camera is at either pole.
Do you see any difference between those 2 sentences besides the order they are constructed? Lets look at the individual components of that sentence shall we?
If the camera is at either pole
and the sun is far enough to see,
the arc would be flat.
So, when is the sun not "far enough to see" exactly?
u/925thejoyisgone/ You are here now.
Polar tilt is the reason for seasons. it doesn't wobble every day. It happens over a year.
Yes, but what you should see in the above video is the tilt. Not the wobble. As the sun should be cutting across the sky at an angel. Just as it does at the North Pole. So, is the video real?
Fair nuff, depending on time of the year and camera location. You probably see the tilt at your location. The sun doesn't go directly overhead does it?
This place is messed up. There are so many things that dont add up. But even with that belief I am not a FEr
According the the Earth model. You should see the tilt no matter where you are. Please view the earth model in this link and then contrast it to this perfect loop as viewed from the South Pole. Which is an impossibility.
No, the real pole is the center of axis. And the sun is not directly overhead, its over the equator or at least between the tropics. So it would travel in a odd arc.
Yes. I know where the pole is. Now simply visualize the horizontal line in the middle being the track of the sun. And drop it down to the bottom of the planet. That is the path of the sun on a 2D plane.
Why would you even imply the sun is directly overhead? Or the equator, when the topic is the pole? Did you even watch the video?
Yes I watched the video.
If the camera is at either pole and the sun is far enough to see, the arc would be flat.
Lets just examine this single statement you made.
Now lets change the construction of the sentence without losing meaning, placing the results at the beginning.
Do you see any difference between those 2 sentences besides the order they are constructed? Lets look at the individual components of that sentence shall we?
So, when is the sun not "far enough to see" exactly?
Submission Statement: TILT!
https://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/axial-tilt-obliquity.html
https://conspiracies.win/p/16a9zodX0h/x/c/4Tq14PzCYaY?d=50
The results of that conversation:
https://conspiracies.win/p/16aA4OVEMZ/a-motion-for-banning-flat-earth-/c/