I used to check out Infowars about once a week, at least. I would play the podcast and suffer through the equivalent of an hour's worth of vitamin commercials.
And Infowars is a better source of news than mainstream fake news jew media.
But the last year I've significantly cut back on infowars content, finding more intriguing sources of information in its place.
I think the lawsuits against Alex Jones took a lot of wind out of his sail and Infowars does seem to have topics they don't want to touch, such as the jew problem and others.
Owen Shroyer is a good host and has great endurance and stamina doing long broadcasts and putting in many hours of work. But he doesn't hold up well in some debates such as his brief debate with Adam Green.
i do think Alex Jones helped pioneer the genre of conspiracies the last 20 years and deserves a modicum of respect even if there are some subjects he's not able to talk about or discuss or some realizations of truth he's missed. I do not believe claims that he is completely controlled fake opposition.
Alex Jones does speak of Nazis as some kind of evil people and tries to depict DemoKKKrats as having characteristics and beliefs consistent with the stereotypical "evil white nazi german." On that subject he's way off the mark. Is he purposely deceiving people? Probably not.
Prior to the scamdemic, speaking of the holohoax or satanic jews was far more taboo that it is now. There's people who took far more risk speaking out against it years ago.
I don't remember when it started but Alex became pro Zionists way before the lawsuits. I have no idea if he is compromised or just being weird, but either way it's not a new thing he screeches about satanists without mentioning their Jewish counterpart.
Listening to infowars and Alex Jones was fun when demoKKKrats were in meltdown mode over Trump. But Alex Jones did kind of play into the cult of personality of Trump that led many to believe he was taking on the globalists when Trump actually did play into globalists' hands in many ways.
Politics is a complicated game in which you have to pick your battles wisely. You can't just 100% take every position you whole-heartedly believe in if elections are real and you have to shill for 50.1% of the electorate. Now that we know better and know elections are defrauded and democracy is a lie, there's no need to shill for that 50.1% of the electorate.
I do not believe claims that he is completely controlled fake opposition.
a) information warfare (info-wars) implies the main means of the few to steer the many through mass suggestion. It doesn't matter if one consents to agree or disagree with suggested information...only that one consents to suggested (information) over perceivable (inspiration), which lures one into "info-wars".
I used to check out Infowars about once a week, at least. I would play the podcast and suffer through the equivalent of an hour's worth of vitamin commercials.
And Infowars is a better source of news than mainstream fake news jew media.
But the last year I've significantly cut back on infowars content, finding more intriguing sources of information in its place.
I think the lawsuits against Alex Jones took a lot of wind out of his sail and Infowars does seem to have topics they don't want to touch, such as the jew problem and others.
Owen Shroyer is a good host and has great endurance and stamina doing long broadcasts and putting in many hours of work. But he doesn't hold up well in some debates such as his brief debate with Adam Green.
i do think Alex Jones helped pioneer the genre of conspiracies the last 20 years and deserves a modicum of respect even if there are some subjects he's not able to talk about or discuss or some realizations of truth he's missed. I do not believe claims that he is completely controlled fake opposition.
> topics they don't want to touch, such as the jew problem
for me, that's the big litmus test for any voice/media that claims to be redpilled. especially whether or not they'll touch the holohoax.
Alex Jones does speak of Nazis as some kind of evil people and tries to depict DemoKKKrats as having characteristics and beliefs consistent with the stereotypical "evil white nazi german." On that subject he's way off the mark. Is he purposely deceiving people? Probably not.
Prior to the scamdemic, speaking of the holohoax or satanic jews was far more taboo that it is now. There's people who took far more risk speaking out against it years ago.
I don't remember when it started but Alex became pro Zionists way before the lawsuits. I have no idea if he is compromised or just being weird, but either way it's not a new thing he screeches about satanists without mentioning their Jewish counterpart.
Yeah. Criticism he deserves.
Listening to infowars and Alex Jones was fun when demoKKKrats were in meltdown mode over Trump. But Alex Jones did kind of play into the cult of personality of Trump that led many to believe he was taking on the globalists when Trump actually did play into globalists' hands in many ways.
Politics is a complicated game in which you have to pick your battles wisely. You can't just 100% take every position you whole-heartedly believe in if elections are real and you have to shill for 50.1% of the electorate. Now that we know better and know elections are defrauded and democracy is a lie, there's no need to shill for that 50.1% of the electorate.
a) information warfare (info-wars) implies the main means of the few to steer the many through mass suggestion. It doesn't matter if one consents to agree or disagree with suggested information...only that one consents to suggested (information) over perceivable (inspiration), which lures one into "info-wars".
b) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4OIi-U1Hi4