"Each hen was injected (intramuscular) with 150 μg of the recombination spike protein under the wings, once a week for 4 weeks, and then IgY was extracted and the titer evaluated."
I was trying to research this last night, but every single scientific article and study failed to mention anything about eating the eggs for the IgY benefit, whether it would work or not. All of them discussed extracting the IgY from the yolk, and concentrating it through various processes. I was only able to find one compendium article which said IgY is temperature stable around 10 to 70 degrees Celsius (if I remember correctly), and it became less effective and began to break down at higher temperatures, but it never mentioned if higher temperatures conpletely destroyed all of it, or only a percentage of it, variant upon temperature.
If only some of it is destroyed by temperature, then people could still gain the benefit of the remainder, moreso with specific cooking techniques (where eggs would retain their runny yolk).
Have you ever heard of people eating eggs with a runny yolk? Yolk cooks at 165°F, below the 212°F required to denature proteins according to your link, thus, the IgY would remain intact.
As I said, none of the scientific articles I've found discussing IgY mentions anything about people consuming eggs. They only mentioned extracting it from the yolk, concentrating it, and administering the concentrate. I assume with your prickly attitude that you don't have a source specifically on IgY and human consumption?
This is the only article I found which mentioned the heat tolerances of IgY. Still, it mentions nothing about human consumption.
This protein is manufactured in the yolk of vaccinated chickens. There is something on it from 2000 I believe.
They dry the yolks and add it to feed to prevent infection in the animals, I think. I don’t know much about how much IgY natural occurred in egg yolk though.
So, it's your claim that when they openly state that their mRNA gene therapy causes your body to create a pathogen, they are lying? A pathogen that causes nerve damage, heart inflammation AIDS and cancer, doesn't exist? Despite those things being a direct effect of their gene therapy. Am I getting this right?
We do not know what the vaccines against sars cov 2 actually contain. We have no evidence. There is no transparency. As far as I am concerned this is a huge lie.
No it doesn't. It's based on a computer model, it only exists in computers.
SARS-CoV-2 is just the computer model they used for the tests. It's not the current 'virus'. The mRNA gene therapies cause your body to create the spike protean. Do they have other junk in those shots? Yes, but that doesn't change their base function. And the spike protean that is the pathogen, and merely a short segment of genetic debris, or prion, actually does exist.
There is no current or past virus. It is an assumed computer stimulation made on a hypothesis. They have no physical virus to accpunt for the pneumonia observed in Wuhan.
The deception is evident but one must be able to read and understand the original reports published in NEJM and Nature.
Furthermore noone has access to what the so called vaccines contain. As far as I am concerned they can contain anything to nothing.
No.
This has nothing to do with eggs we eat.
"Each hen was injected (intramuscular) with 150 μg of the recombination spike protein under the wings, once a week for 4 weeks, and then IgY was extracted and the titer evaluated."
Cooking denatures the proteins in the yolk.
Didn't you learn anything in school?
Would you mind linking a source for this?
I was trying to research this last night, but every single scientific article and study failed to mention anything about eating the eggs for the IgY benefit, whether it would work or not. All of them discussed extracting the IgY from the yolk, and concentrating it through various processes. I was only able to find one compendium article which said IgY is temperature stable around 10 to 70 degrees Celsius (if I remember correctly), and it became less effective and began to break down at higher temperatures, but it never mentioned if higher temperatures conpletely destroyed all of it, or only a percentage of it, variant upon temperature.
If only some of it is destroyed by temperature, then people could still gain the benefit of the remainder, moreso with specific cooking techniques (where eggs would retain their runny yolk).
Are you fucking serious?
In case you aren't, here you go
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=at+what+temperature+does+protein+denature
#triggered
Have you ever heard of people eating eggs with a runny yolk? Yolk cooks at 165°F, below the 212°F required to denature proteins according to your link, thus, the IgY would remain intact.
As I said, none of the scientific articles I've found discussing IgY mentions anything about people consuming eggs. They only mentioned extracting it from the yolk, concentrating it, and administering the concentrate. I assume with your prickly attitude that you don't have a source specifically on IgY and human consumption?
This is the only article I found which mentioned the heat tolerances of IgY. Still, it mentions nothing about human consumption.
Nicotine also blocks covid spikes especially in neurological tissue
This protein is manufactured in the yolk of vaccinated chickens. There is something on it from 2000 I believe. They dry the yolks and add it to feed to prevent infection in the animals, I think. I don’t know much about how much IgY natural occurred in egg yolk though.
No.
There is no virus thus no spike protein thterefore no antibodies against it.
But the mRNA vaccines cause your cells to create the spike protein which is a pathogen. As for antibodies, there is no such thing.
So who told you that the mRNA encodes a spike protein?
Science did?
So, it's your claim that when they openly state that their mRNA gene therapy causes your body to create a pathogen, they are lying? A pathogen that causes nerve damage, heart inflammation AIDS and cancer, doesn't exist? Despite those things being a direct effect of their gene therapy. Am I getting this right?
Yes.
sARs cov 2 never existed in nature.
We do not know what the vaccines against sars cov 2 actually contain. We have no evidence. There is no transparency. As far as I am concerned this is a huge lie.
No it doesn't. It's based on a computer model, it only exists in computers.
SARS-CoV-2 is just the computer model they used for the tests. It's not the current 'virus'. The mRNA gene therapies cause your body to create the spike protean. Do they have other junk in those shots? Yes, but that doesn't change their base function. And the spike protean that is the pathogen, and merely a short segment of genetic debris, or prion, actually does exist.
There is no current or past virus. It is an assumed computer stimulation made on a hypothesis. They have no physical virus to accpunt for the pneumonia observed in Wuhan. The deception is evident but one must be able to read and understand the original reports published in NEJM and Nature.
Furthermore noone has access to what the so called vaccines contain. As far as I am concerned they can contain anything to nothing.
So who told you that the mRNA encodes a spike protein?
Science did?
So you saw the entire mRNA sequence right?
This (A network analysis of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine patents) proves nothing at all.
Do you even understand what you read and what I asked?
Show me the sequence boi