I hadn't really considered that. What if the welfare checks begin to bounce. What if the same happens to Social Security and other entitlement programs?
After never knowing who Clif High was, I made it a point a couple of months ago to listen to two long interviews back-to-back, each of them a couple of hours. I wanted to establish a proper appraisal of him.
Being a very long show, it took about 10 minutes to really get underway and I could see he was spouting nonsense. It took about 15 more minutes to decide there was no way anyone authentic and actually doing research could be this wrong, and confirmed him as disinfo.
I like to think of myself as a disciplined researcher, so I slogged through all the rest of the material, and by the end of it I wanted to take ice picks to my eardrums. But it all confirmed my initial estimation of him as that common type of disinfo: selling you high-octane fairy tales, after which you get that smug sense of superiority by being "in the know". The waters are completely clouded by gibberish that will ultimately lead you nowhere in particular.
And don't worry, I get it, no one asked for me to badmouth Clif High and no one wants to hear it. But everyone who objects to anything I said here should take a moment to reflect on the question: do you see the dynamic of how such a disinformation agent accomplishes his task?
I'm very surprised he mentioned Biglino, whom I myself would recommend without reservation. I think it's possible that he's yet considered low-profile enough that "They" haven't put their guardrails around him. Just mention Sitchin on r/conspiracy and trolls come out of the woodwork to "debunk" him. That gives me great confidence in his work, of course.
As I've been able to puzzle out, these disinfo agents are given one or more narratives to promote and are warned away from certain "no-go zones". From there they can say as they please, which makes it more naturalistic, but I'm also sure they each have handlers that monitor their work and correct their course as necessary.
All disinfo agents must offer some truth mixed in, but in 3.5-4 hours of material I honestly could not find a single item. For example, given my particular interest, I perked up when he said the Anunnaki had operated a set of "biodomes" or "Edens". Then he mentioned that knowledge of them had been handed down to him from his Gypsy forebears, or some such thing. No honest researcher could possibly expect people to just take their word for something like that.
On the flip side, I too support Trump and do expect a "come back", so there's that...lol. But you can see why even a disinfo agent would be allowed to say this because it's nothing that many others aren't also saying.
The name "Rogelio Boschovich" is new to me and a quick search didn't turn up anything. If you have a link to something to get me started on him, I would appreciate it!
Yeah, it was the "Cathari", and a book of arcane knowledge called the "Codex Oera Linda". You can start this at the beginning because he gets into it within a couple minutes:
I appreciate hearing the insights here. I find Cliffs Intel interesting at times but have to leave it in that limbo gray area of "maybe/maybe not". I've really yet to look back at anything he's said and find it to have been prophetic or profoundly on target. He does something of a mind game that I don't believe would be necessary if he were really 100%. He goes out of his way to call out others in the field as being BS as if he needs to limit your field of valid information so that he appears more relevant. It's a bit of a subtle thing but he does it often enough to show that something about it is calculated. And his discredit to them isn't countered with any solid proof, just his own conjecture that counters theirs. So why do that except as some sort of psyop, I don't get it . He has been at this for a long time and so his observations are interesting, like a talkative neighbor with gossip that is really neither here nor there in the end.
I hadn't really considered that. What if the welfare checks begin to bounce. What if the same happens to Social Security and other entitlement programs?
Even most qtards don't flock to him anymore lol. You can only have so many failed predictions.
After never knowing who Clif High was, I made it a point a couple of months ago to listen to two long interviews back-to-back, each of them a couple of hours. I wanted to establish a proper appraisal of him.
Being a very long show, it took about 10 minutes to really get underway and I could see he was spouting nonsense. It took about 15 more minutes to decide there was no way anyone authentic and actually doing research could be this wrong, and confirmed him as disinfo.
I like to think of myself as a disciplined researcher, so I slogged through all the rest of the material, and by the end of it I wanted to take ice picks to my eardrums. But it all confirmed my initial estimation of him as that common type of disinfo: selling you high-octane fairy tales, after which you get that smug sense of superiority by being "in the know". The waters are completely clouded by gibberish that will ultimately lead you nowhere in particular.
And don't worry, I get it, no one asked for me to badmouth Clif High and no one wants to hear it. But everyone who objects to anything I said here should take a moment to reflect on the question: do you see the dynamic of how such a disinformation agent accomplishes his task?
I'm very surprised he mentioned Biglino, whom I myself would recommend without reservation. I think it's possible that he's yet considered low-profile enough that "They" haven't put their guardrails around him. Just mention Sitchin on r/conspiracy and trolls come out of the woodwork to "debunk" him. That gives me great confidence in his work, of course.
As I've been able to puzzle out, these disinfo agents are given one or more narratives to promote and are warned away from certain "no-go zones". From there they can say as they please, which makes it more naturalistic, but I'm also sure they each have handlers that monitor their work and correct their course as necessary.
All disinfo agents must offer some truth mixed in, but in 3.5-4 hours of material I honestly could not find a single item. For example, given my particular interest, I perked up when he said the Anunnaki had operated a set of "biodomes" or "Edens". Then he mentioned that knowledge of them had been handed down to him from his Gypsy forebears, or some such thing. No honest researcher could possibly expect people to just take their word for something like that.
On the flip side, I too support Trump and do expect a "come back", so there's that...lol. But you can see why even a disinfo agent would be allowed to say this because it's nothing that many others aren't also saying.
The name "Rogelio Boschovich" is new to me and a quick search didn't turn up anything. If you have a link to something to get me started on him, I would appreciate it!
Yeah, it was the "Cathari", and a book of arcane knowledge called the "Codex Oera Linda". You can start this at the beginning because he gets into it within a couple minutes:
New Clif High: Dojo-> Medbeds & the Cathari
Sorry to besmirch Gypsies. It's just that after a while you really cannot keep track of these people (which, yes, I think is part of the strategy).
I appreciate hearing the insights here. I find Cliffs Intel interesting at times but have to leave it in that limbo gray area of "maybe/maybe not". I've really yet to look back at anything he's said and find it to have been prophetic or profoundly on target. He does something of a mind game that I don't believe would be necessary if he were really 100%. He goes out of his way to call out others in the field as being BS as if he needs to limit your field of valid information so that he appears more relevant. It's a bit of a subtle thing but he does it often enough to show that something about it is calculated. And his discredit to them isn't countered with any solid proof, just his own conjecture that counters theirs. So why do that except as some sort of psyop, I don't get it . He has been at this for a long time and so his observations are interesting, like a talkative neighbor with gossip that is really neither here nor there in the end.