Take something like Flat Earth Theory. Okay, if that's real, how can you do something different and gain benefit from it? Can you create an airline service with quicker flights to certain destinations?
I was just reading a conspiracy theory about how the The Great Pyramid was actually a device to change the magnetic poles. Okay, can we recreate it to change the poles again?
What are some conspiracy theories that if true can actually lead to us doing something different? How can we benefit from knowing the "truth"?
a) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...hence; perceiving (esoteric) within perceivable (exoteric).
b) same origin (inception); same outcome (death)...different in-between (life).
Suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything).
Ones (not we) choice to adapt to perceivable (knowledge) grows ones resistance (living) within temptation (process of dying). More resistance equals prolonged duration (life) within velocity (inception towards death), while resisting grows one comprehension (potential) about everything perceivable (potentiality).
Prolonged duration and increased potential...both grown through oneself, not gained by suggested outcomes.
You are a bad person.
a) good vs bad represents a conflict of reason one gets tempted into when consenting to want or not want a suggestion.
b) person aka PER SONOS (by sound) implies the ignored need for one to adapt to perceivable sound as the perceiving instrument within.
c) if the instrument chooses to ignore need (resonance) for want (dissonance); only then can there be a want vs not want aka good vs bade conflict. Sound doesn't shape conflict...it generates order.
To be able for one to suggest to another "you are", one has to willingly ignore that everything perceivable "was" before one can shape a suggestion about what "is" out of it.
a) A (abbreviation of Greek; ana) - "signify of each separately, or that the things mentioned should be taken in quantities of the same weight or measure."
The few suggest "bad person" to tempt the many to utilize it as a quantity of measurement, which when consented to, tempts one to ignore the only perceivable unit that can be measured...UNIT; UNITAS; UNITY; UNUS - "one".
Yes, yes. You spam the forums with garbage. It's what you do.
Op asked for different outcomes...your agreements (yes) vs disagreements (no) only keep you within the same conflict (yes vs no)...no matter which side you choose. Do you have any memorable "wins" in your yes vs no conflicts?
G'ARBAGE; noun - "refused parts; unfit for use or rejected"...what if every part (living) fits into the whole (process of dying), yet also has the individual free will of choice to refuse perceivable (need) for suggested (want), hence partials refusing each other, hence becoming unfit among each other?
One (living) can only respond to being done by (process of dying). Doing implies execution, yet only the process of dying can execute everything living within. How could choice "do", when choice implies a response to balance (need/want), hence being "done by". What if choice represents a "re-do"´aka response to being done?
Here's the Tavistock origin of "spam" for public relations use... https://vimeo.com/329001211 Be aware that a forum represents a market-place, hence the breeding ground for choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...a "questionable" practice if you ask me...