Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

23
()
posted 2 years ago by BuckeyePatr1ot 2 years ago by BuckeyePatr1ot +25 / -2
15 comments share
15 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
▲ -1 ▼
– TallestSkil -1 points 2 years ago +2 / -3

I really don’t like that chart, since it’s copying and pasting the old observations and claiming they’ll magically happen again.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MrPancake 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

It's just forecasting Tallest; weathermen do it all the time and they are right a good 33% of the time ;)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– TallestSkil 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

The sunspot record is the oldest, unbroken, and most broadly testable body of scientific knowledge that we have as a species. From the invention of the telescope, anyone, anywhere on Earth, could catalog the number, placement, and timing of sunspots. We know it’s good, we know it’s accurate.

So to sully it by taking a graph of sunspot data and just chopping up the Maunder Minimum and pasting it onto the future, as though we somehow “know” what’s going to happen, magically, in the future, is a calumny of the highest order. We have no fucking clue what’s going to happen. We can get a broad idea, based on the current location of planets within the Sun’s magnetosphere with respect to their placement in previous supercycles, sure. But we don’t know. We have no clue how long a future minimum will last nor how it will look, but the chart above just copies and pastes. It should be removed solely for that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy