Fucking journalists
(i.redd.it)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Far VASTER. VASTER. This fucking moron likely has a college degree and can't even use proper grammar. What a dipshit
another loser
He's a Sodomite, what do you expect?
"He lives in Washington, D.C., and is a fan of boxing, the NBA, Dungeons & Dragons, sci-fi, cinema, comic books, TV, novels, fantasy basketball, his mother, his two nieces and his cat, Dr. Julius "Jules" Jonas Jonah Jameson."
This clown probably uses ChatTGP to write his “articles”, if he’s even real.
Now write about how USA meddles and influences in other nations' elections.
For example, The CIA under Hussein Obama meddled in and effected the elections in Egypt, Ukraine, Libya, etc. Even going so far as to hire dangerous terrorist mercenaries and arming them to murder government leaders of other nations.
If this is immoral, then Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton deserve maximum punishment, possibly even execution, for hiring and arming Boko Haram to murder Qadaffi and sodomize his corpse. Boko Haram then used the money, weapons, and resources provided by Obama/Hillary/CIA to kidnap and gang rape underage black Nigerian Christian schoolgirls. What punishment other than execution do they deserve for these crimes, Tim Starks you fucking faggot?
Don't you mean sci-fi writers?
Suggested journalism tempts ones consent to suggested JOURNAL, noun (Latin diurnum; daily) - "a diary; an account of daily transactions and events"; while ignoring perceivable JOURNEY, noun (Latin diurnus, dies) - "the travel of a day" aka ones (life) passage from one place (inception) towards another (death).
The difference? The few tempt the many to "follow" suggested journalism, while ignoring to "resist" the journey from inception towards death...
a) RATE, noun (Latin ratus, reor, retor, redor, or resor; ratio; reason) - "the proportion or standard by which quantity or value is adjusted"
The few suggest the many to rate each others suggested values, while ignoring to be evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable).
b) nature doesn't need to be rated; it represents the whole value (process of dying) for each partial evaluation (living) within. Adjustment implies adaptation of mind (living) to that which just is (process of dying).
c) notice that the few suggest the many the tools to rate each other (up vs down-vote); then notice that free-will-of-choice neither up-votes (want), nor down-votes (not want), hence adapting to balance (need). I also don't offer (suggestion), hence "post score: 0", which in return allows me to adapt to everything offered (perceivable).
a) how could one grow within perceivable if one consents to "stand under" suggested?
b) most lack to comprehend that perceivable nature doesn't SAY, verb - "to utter in words" anything....it communicates sound for response by resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
c) trying to find meaning in words shapes one into the play-toy for those suggesting the meaning of words.
AL'TER, verb transitive [Latin alter another. See Alien.] - "to make some change in; to make different in some particular"...what if reality represents constant change (process of dying), making different particulars (living), which in return can RE (respond to) MAKE (being made by)?
What if fiction (suggested information) represents ones consent to ignore reality (perceivable inspiration)?
Does slapping a label (word) on a moving system (sound), to tempt those within to ignore being moved, change the moving system or does it represent the impropriety of "turning a blind eye" to ones response-ability (choice) within a balance based system (momentum of motion)?
What if one cannot manipulate (manual operation) the natural order (automatic operation)...only tempt the temporary chaos within to ignore manually sustaining self (living) within the automatic order (process of dying)?