Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

21
()
posted 2 years ago by BuckeyePatr1ot 2 years ago by BuckeyePatr1ot +23 / -2
15 comments share
15 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– cxivv 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

5G allows for more devices connected at the same time in a cell and more efficient usage of the available bandwidth.

For an ISP that's nice as they can service more people with less equipment at the cost of more power usage as the technology needs to mature. For the end user things might respond a bit better but batteries will go down faster.

little spy crap will not be running 5g in the foreseeable future as it's just to compute and power intensive. Big spy stuff like CCTV can be run on 4G and other networks on government frequencies.

Basically it's an over blown slight upgrade over existing technology

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

You can't use all available bandwidth of 4G and often even 3G, because bandwidth is limited not by bandwidth of mobile - base station link, but by base station - internet link.

For an ISP that's nice as they can service more people with less equipment

They can't. Because the bottleneck is between base station and internet, not between mobile and BS. People don't need faster connetion to BS, they need faster connection to internet.

little spy crap will not be running 5g in the foreseeable future

Nearly everybody have spy crap in pocket. Powerful enough crap. But you can't stream all data continously from that devices, first - bottleneck from BS to server and second - power consumption. 5G with local storage and lower power consumtion solves that surveillance problem perfectly.

Basically it's an over blown slight upgrade over existing technology.

Senseless for customer upgrade. Customer will prefer more base stations with thick fiber uplinks, not adding 5G modules to base stations without any upgrade of infrastructure.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy