Here’s a rare conspiracy most people haven’t heard of. I read it from Rothschilds 2009 Q&A called “I am rofschild, axe me a question”.
Rothschild (red shield of Rome) knows a lot because he is literally the guardian of the Roman Empire and manages their money.
He said back in ancient times, humans instinctively and intuitively knew stuff until the Egyptian devil cult government created language with the intention to create mass separation of concepts. Before, humans saw all of Life as One but by naming stuff, they slowly began seeing things as totally separate and independent objects or people.
This isn’t true because a tree becomes a chair then becomes a fire and then becomes ashes and then ashes become part of the Earth which can then become almost anything including part of the food that is eaten by a mother to produce another baby human. Everything is all mega system but to confuse the People, the Egyptians created language.
Some might say verbal language is necessary but in the future we will all use visual telepathy to speak which means images (not words). Our intuition always plays a part and figures things out for us but more so without language.
So by creating language, the deep state put humans a step back from full blown telepathy which is a much easier form of communication.
Also, Social Media is tech assisted telepathy. It has primed our mind to do telepathy meaning if it was ever shut down, humans would discover telepathy. This is 1 reason why they can’t shut down the internet.
Would this have anything to do with the Tower of Babel story?
Babel was theorized by a descendent of one of the Nephalim named Nod.
After 5 years, they couldn’t figure out what to use it for. Either a religious tower for God, a racial remembrance tower for nodites, or a general cultural tower of arts, manufacturing, ect..
The dispute got so bad that they had a major war over it and the tower was left unfinished. 12,000 years ago they tried making it again over the ruble of the first one but failed.
Not sure why the deep state likes it so much? Probably because Nod was the leader of the Nephalim that joined Lucifer. The Nephalim that stuck with God were lead by Van. Lake Van in Turkey is named after him.
The GEMARA (suggested information) build upon the MISHNAH (perceivable inspiration) represents the ongoing building of the tower of babel (confusion, disorder)...utilizing everyone consenting to any suggested information as the ingredients, the tools and the workers to build up one collapse after the next (civilizations; nations; cultures etc.).
The reasoning of the many over the suggestions of the few represents the applied GEMARA upon the many, while the few are utilizing the MISHNAH (perceivable inspiration) as the foundation the many ignore to adapt to.
Accumulating suggested information by consenting to it represents building the tower of BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] - "confusion; disorder". Only the foundation (perceivable inspiration) remains after the collapse of each one's tower aka the ongoing natural order (inception towards death) tumbling all the temporary chaos (life) build within.
Is this an official Q and A that happened or one of those 4chan secret anonymous interview?
i love those 4chan insider threads. even if they're 100% LARP, they always posit a few good/interesting ideas or possibilities worth considering.
'We made a vow with our lives but we like you'
or the
'This CEO mason was drunk and told me everything!'
https://archive.ph/qERv5 (on godlikeproductions)
No. If you're animal. But even animals communicate to extents and instincts. With animal instinct, various sounds echo their behaviour. So if their function was entirely primal. Hunt, defend, attack, mate, survive. No, you don't need speech. Do you. You just need another animal sound and a few gestures, expressing it. God damn it. You're not a telepath, just another gorilla pounding on its chest hooting at the moon.
a) doesn't suggested "animal" imply perceivable "animation"?
b) AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.]...doesn't that represent every form animated within, hence HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.]...doesn't animation (animal) specify (human) everyone (living) within everything (process of dying)?
My study shows that the mind of God holds all concepts which we can think of and being into reality.
Thought turns into ether. Ether turns into plasma. Plasma turns into the 4 elements.
Why do feeemasons like 33?
Plasma might also refer to what you say but I’m referring to another material that forms the 4 elements.
Plasma is a portion of our blood too.
a) what does nature withhold from those within?
b) doesn't being able to perceive imply being within everything perceivable impressing upon one for expression?
c) what if everything gives, while everyone is being tempted to want to hold onto, while ignoring the need to adapt to that which keeps on giving?
d) what if the suggested brand "God" tempts one to want to hold onto (suggested), while ignoring that which keeps on giving (perceivable)?
I’m not sure what you are asking. Can you rephrase?
a) how does holding onto fit into the concept of a giver?
b) does a mind/memory need to hold onto, or would the want to hold onto slow down the processing speed of the memory?
c) if all is held within mind, then how could there be more of all outside mind?
The mind of God has all concepts that can be drawn into your mind and released as needed.
Many people overwork their brain. Instead just silence the mind and all the knowledge that is needed at the moment just come to you. That way your brain gets to rest.
a) what you're describing represents memory to memory information exchange, which ignores input to memory communication. A memory represents a reaction to enacting input. The web, stored as information on memory (server farms), requires an ongoing energy source to store, transfer and exchange information, which only then allows users to add their memory to the mix.
b) within reality...nature represents the ongoing input (perceivable), while those within (perceiving) represent the temporary memory, a memory required to have a moment(um) to think about reacting within enacting, hence to balance choices made.
Only memory allows choice to consider what was and what will be within what is.
c) the cause doesn't have a hold function, it's not a release from, it represents ongoing loss, which in return allows the effect to temporary grow, hence having a memory to hold onto growth (living) while within loss (process of dying).
d) the natural order doesn't require a need, since it simply goes on. The temporary chaos within the ongoing natural order require a need to distinguish themselves (the choice of want aka the will), hence struggling to sustain self as want within need. The living "need" the process of dying, yet the ongoing tempts the temporary to "want" to ignore resisting.
In simple...only if you put something into motion can there be a need/want balance (aka the momentum of motion) for a choice within to balance.
a) if all represents one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power", then one exists at the center of work, hence "as above, so below". OVER and UNDER represent ones reacting choice within the need to WORK.
b) by consenting to the suggested information by the few, the many are willingly repressing their memories by accumulation. Meanwhile; adaptation to perceivable inspiration represents expression (growth) within impressing (loss).
c) the more perceivable one ignores for suggested, the less one comprehends (growth within) perceivable...hence self imposed repression of expression.
The few use suggestion to tempt the vessel (life) within flow (inception towards death) to drown itself by accumulating flotsam. The vessel doesn't need the stuff from others (suggested information), it needs to adapt to the flow (perceivable inspiration) as to be able to stay afloat.
That implies ones choice to resist the suggested temptations from others, hence then allowing the mind to adapt to the perceivable flow of inspiration without (with less) distractions.
The real communication between perceivable (enacting) and perceiving (reaction) continues from inception towards death, hence throughout the entire life. The fictitious miscommunication between perceiving (reaction) and suggesting (reaction) represents the temptation to ignore the perceivable (enacting)...both coexist as balance aka need (perceivable) or want (suggested) for ones free will of choice.
The more one chooses the latter (temptation), the less one grows (resistance) within the former (velocity).
The perceivable (knowledge) moment represents the momentum of ongoing motion. This momentum represents the self differentiation of ongoing whole (process of dying) into temporary partial (living), hence an ongoing balance for each temporary choice. Balancing (adaptation to momentum) represents the need; choice (to ignore adaptation) represents the want.
Hold your breath (choice to want to ignore need) and learn that need forces itself upon want...you now have a lifetime to learn from that lesson about the consequences of wanting to ignore need.
a) there can be only one way (inception towards death) for all life.
b) being within that way contradicts the cessation of motion (rest)..."no rest for the wicked (departed)"
c) RE (response to) ST (stop aka ones choice to ignore all motion)
Go shopping. Each person you come across, you instinctively do a threat level for each.
Discernment? Are we "seeing " other's light? Or just calculating?
This is deep. I like it.
INTUI'TION, noun [Latin intuitus, intueor; in and tueor.] - "a looking on; a sight or view; but restricted to mental view or perception"
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"
Hence intuition representing IN (being within) TUEOR (perceivable knowledge), which implies as the perceiving recipient thereof.
Suggesting words over perceivable sound implies transmutation of suggested ingredient out of perceivable base, not creation out of nothing. The few suggest creationism to tempt the consenting many to ignore being the perceiving ingredient within the perceivable base, hence representing alchemical transmutation...not creation of creator.
As for "until"...everyone (perceiving) still exists within everything (perceivable); each one of the many simply willingly ignores that for the suggestions of the few.
a) nature represents the mass separation of incepts, hence the whole (process of dying) generating the inception of each partial one living within.
b) the few suggest mass accumulation to each other one, hence shaping the accumulated, compounded many by the consent of each one to be a part of e pluribus unum (out of many, one), tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together); united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; equality (same) through diversity (different).
c) living within the process of dying implies apartheid within wholeness, hence the temporary struggle to sustain apartheid (life) while being re-accumulated (inception towards death) back into wholeness. And once again the RE (response to) implies ones response to temporary resist (living) the ongoing temptation (dying).
Each ONE partial (living) within the whole (process of dying) ONENESS.
a) everything perceivable represents a moving differences from the one perceiving it.
b) IN (being within) DEPENDENT (dependency to) implies being alive within (in) the process of dying (dependent).
c) a thing (partial) cannot see a total (whole), only the ongoing separation of the whole into each partial through the momentum of motion.
Therefore each one represents TELE (living apart) within PATH (whole process of dying).
What would ONENESS reason about and with whom? ONENESS operates on implication (if/then), the ones within can choose to ignore it for reasoning against other ones about what suggestions mean.
All represents one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka temporary conscious awareness within ongoing implications...and the free will of choice to react in adherence (need) or ignorance (want).