Intelligence
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
When the internet is opened, AI tells the truth. Go fricking figure.
For those who consent to artificial understanding (suggested information) over natural knowledge (perceivable inspiration) it is what others suggested it was.
not that intelligent. Bobby Clairday says it was the worst attack since, whereas the AI misinterprets that as a worse attack than
It is fucking hilarious how this site is just a place where retards circlejerk over screenshots from other sites.
Unfortunately most people are viewing these things on their phones. And most sites run their own apps. Meaning the only way they can view these is as visual soundbites.
The .jpeg I posted is larger than the webpage being shown. But what are you going to do about it? This is the state of the internet we have.
I can literally make a fake twitter post about any topic I want, take a screenshot and post it here and you would just eat it up if it confirmed your bias.
Prove it
Suggestion
Consent
Implication (if/then) applied to reason (agreement vs disagreement)
a) what if suggested (want) tempts one to ignore perceivable (need)?
b) what if consenting to suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore adapting to perceivable (reality)?
c) what if consenting to want or not want suggested, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable, results in a conflict of reason (want versus not want)?
Could the few utilize suggestion to divide the many into reasoning against themselves over the suggested, which would allow the few not only control over both sides of ever conflict, but also the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will?
a) how could one send anything from screen to screen without it representing a "screenshot"?
b) ever noticed that whatever is on a screen represents either a tranquilizer or adrenaline shot for those consenting to look at it? Are viewers looking for screenshots while getting shot by the screen?