It's called pattern recondition, and the proper application of words. As I know what a mental disorder is, and what social controls are, and they are not one in the same. For example, you can ratchet down conservatism to the point of witch hunts, or go sodom and gomorrah on it with liberalism. All systems can be corrupted. You just need to know how to instigate it.
This is just talking out the side of your mouth.
What an odd way of saying, I came into a thread and offered up my opinion. Oh, I mean, you're just talking out the side of your mouth.
See what we both did there? We both labeled an opinion, as to dismiss it without thought. Congratulations! Task failed successfully!
More of the same stuff, you are here attempting to deride and belittle the communication with illogical assessments of the actual information. You follow up with diverting to another group any remaining consideration, it's ridiculous, I was just being nice.
In a statement, the left reveals it's mental disorder as the requirement to be protected and cared for in a system of living and life that wants the opposite.
It is more than an opinion, there is reams of data to prove the statements, you need only discover it.
Please see fit to read your title back to yourself. It asks a Question. I attempted to address that Question.
Speaking of which. Can you tell me what the point of that article is? Allow me to cut and paste it in it's etriety, so as you can point out to me what is, and is not important within it's text. In advance, thank you!
The shadow attacks: “Does anyone doubt that leftism is a mental disorder?”
The Jewish actress Natalie Portman joined the wave of condemnations against the anti-Semitic rapper Kanye West. In a post published by the actress, she wrote to her eight million followers: “Seeing the resurgence of anti-Semitism makes my heart sink.”
“This hatred must be fought with boundless love for each other,” she added. “Today I send great love to my Jewish brothers, and to everyone who stands with us against these violent words and actions,” Portman wrote. “It is painful and terrifying to hear this. I am grateful to those who continue to speak out against anti-Semitism, and against all forms of racism.”
More in-
The person who was least impressed by the post is Yoav Eliasi, the one who is the “Shadow”. And so he wrote on his Instagram account: “Speaking for Israel is illegitimate, but fighting anti-Semitism is proper.” “Natalie Portman to the foreign media: Israel is an occupier, Israel is apartheid, Sheikh Jarrah will be released, the IDF is killing people in Gaza,” he wrote under the photo he attached to the post in which he presented her contradictory statements. “Natalie Portman too,” he continued. “‘I send a hug. to the Jewish people. We need to fight anti-Semitism’. Does anyone still doubt that leftism is a mental disorder?”, he asked rhetorically.
It's called pattern recondition, and the proper application of words. As I know what a mental disorder is, and what social controls are, and they are not one in the same. For example, you can ratchet down conservatism to the point of witch hunts, or go sodom and gomorrah on it with liberalism. All systems can be corrupted. You just need to know how to instigate it.
What an odd way of saying, I came into a thread and offered up my opinion. Oh, I mean, you're just talking out the side of your mouth.
See what we both did there? We both labeled an opinion, as to dismiss it without thought. Congratulations! Task failed successfully!
More of the same stuff, you are here attempting to deride and belittle the communication with illogical assessments of the actual information. You follow up with diverting to another group any remaining consideration, it's ridiculous, I was just being nice.
In a statement, the left reveals it's mental disorder as the requirement to be protected and cared for in a system of living and life that wants the opposite.
It is more than an opinion, there is reams of data to prove the statements, you need only discover it.
Please see fit to read your title back to yourself. It asks a Question. I attempted to address that Question.
Speaking of which. Can you tell me what the point of that article is? Allow me to cut and paste it in it's etriety, so as you can point out to me what is, and is not important within it's text. In advance, thank you!
No, seriously. What?