Perhaps I read into it too much.

I still think that if this community, being the good researchers and skeptics that we are, dug deeper into what actually took place at nuremburg trials, we would find it was not actually well intentioned or even fair in achieving justice and that once again, history was deceptively written by the winners.

But I do not consider myself an expert on the history of the Nuremberg trials. I just think to say they were great in a dismissive statement is taking a subject too lightly or too easily passing judgement on something and quickly moving on.

The concept of basic human rights, often called natural law, long pre-existed Nuremberg trials.