FWIW, a few notes as I've been able to put the topic together. It turns out that the Elohim of the Bible are the same as the Anunnaki of the Sumerians. They wrote about them much more clearly than was done in the Bible, and I would suggest you'd be well served to study them in that context then refer back to the Bible.
The somewhat challenging part is to sort out who's who between the two contexts, because it's very easy to get confused. Here's a very short guide:
Anu is the king of the Anunnaki's home planet of Nibiru. He actually is never mentioned in the Bible so far as I know.
Enlil is his son and the leader of the expedition to the Earth. Technically, the Anunnaki refers specifically to this expedition: "those who to Earth from Heaven came". He is Yahweh of the Bible, and also referred to as El Elyon and Adonai (although I haven't done any sort of exhaustive study).
There were 600 Elohim/Anunnaki in total (plus some number of leaders). Satan, Michael, and Gabriel each led groups of 200. Satan rebelled with his faction who became known as the Fallen Angels. The rest of the expedition returned while they were marooned.
You may at this point be wondering about the real Almighty God, the Supreme Deity. He is not a Nibiruan, and this is the absolute and fundamental error of all Biblical exegesis. He is, though, mentioned a single time in the very first sentence (as you might expect), the mistranslated Genesis 1:1.
All ancient Hebrew sacred texts begin with an aleph, except Genesis. Bizarre, no? What happens if we put back just that single letter? Everything changes.
The Father of the Beginnings created the Elohim, the Heavens, and the Earth.
And that boots us into the interactions of the Anunnaki with our little planet.
Note: purposely damaged . . . where a few characters where removed (obviously) from the . . phrase
All ancient Hebrew sacred texts begin with an aleph, except Genesis. Bizarre, no? What happens if we put back just that single letter? Everything changes.
The Father of the Beginnings created the Elohim, the Heavens, and the Earth.
Weirdly very similar to the "purposely damaged . . . stenography in the Epstein images hosted on the NY Times site" , where a few characters where removed (obviously) from the embedded SSH key so it couldn't be retrieved with an automated tool.
FWIW, a few notes as I've been able to put the topic together. It turns out that the Elohim of the Bible are the same as the Anunnaki of the Sumerians. They wrote about them much more clearly than was done in the Bible, and I would suggest you'd be well served to study them in that context then refer back to the Bible.
The somewhat challenging part is to sort out who's who between the two contexts, because it's very easy to get confused. Here's a very short guide:
Anu is the king of the Anunnaki's home planet of Nibiru. He actually is never mentioned in the Bible so far as I know.
Enlil is his son and the leader of the expedition to the Earth. Technically, the Anunnaki refers specifically to this expedition: "those who to Earth from Heaven came". He is Yahweh of the Bible, and also referred to as El Elyon and Adonai (although I haven't done any sort of exhaustive study).
There were 600 Elohim/Anunnaki in total (plus some number of leaders). Satan, Michael, and Gabriel each led groups of 200. Satan rebelled with his faction who became known as the Fallen Angels. The rest of the expedition returned while they were marooned.
You may at this point be wondering about the real Almighty God, the Supreme Deity. He is not a Nibiruan, and this is the absolute and fundamental error of all Biblical exegesis. He is, though, mentioned a single time in the very first sentence (as you might expect), the mistranslated Genesis 1:1.
All ancient Hebrew sacred texts begin with an aleph, except Genesis. Bizarre, no? What happens if we put back just that single letter? Everything changes.
And that boots us into the interactions of the Anunnaki with our little planet.
Note: purposely damaged . . . where a few characters where removed (obviously) from the . . phrase
Weirdly very similar to the "purposely damaged . . . stenography in the Epstein images hosted on the NY Times site" , where a few characters where removed (obviously) from the embedded SSH key so it couldn't be retrieved with an automated tool.
See the current thread