FWIW, a few notes as I've been able to put the topic together. It turns out that the Elohim of the Bible are the same as the Anunnaki of the Sumerians. They wrote about them much more clearly than was done in the Bible, and I would suggest you'd be well served to study them in that context then refer back to the Bible.
The somewhat challenging part is to sort out who's who between the two contexts, because it's very easy to get confused. Here's a very short guide:
Anu is the king of the Anunnaki's home planet of Nibiru. He actually is never mentioned in the Bible so far as I know.
Enlil is his son and the leader of the expedition to the Earth. Technically, the Anunnaki refers specifically to this expedition: "those who to Earth from Heaven came". He is Yahweh of the Bible, and also referred to as El Elyon and Adonai (although I haven't done any sort of exhaustive study).
There were 600 Elohim/Anunnaki in total (plus some number of leaders). Satan, Michael, and Gabriel each led groups of 200. Satan rebelled with his faction who became known as the Fallen Angels. The rest of the expedition returned while they were marooned.
You may at this point be wondering about the real Almighty God, the Supreme Deity. He is not a Nibiruan, and this is the absolute and fundamental error of all Biblical exegesis. He is, though, mentioned a single time in the very first sentence (as you might expect), the mistranslated Genesis 1:1.
All ancient Hebrew sacred texts begin with an aleph, except Genesis. Bizarre, no? What happens if we put back just that single letter? Everything changes.
The Father of the Beginnings created the Elohim, the Heavens, and the Earth.
And that boots us into the interactions of the Anunnaki with our little planet.
I believe Enki is mentioned only in two places in the Bible:
It's not absolutely clear, but as to the identity of the "nachash" in the Garden of Eden narrative, I believe the strongest case is to be made for Enki. Note that I absolutely do not believe the nachash was Satan. This narrative is wildly misread, demonstrably so, and thus completely misunderstood.
He is mentioned a single time as "Shahar", and this was his name in the Ugarit pantheon. I don't think conventional researchers have yet made this association, but it seemed quite evident to me. How they miss all this stuff after so long is baffling.
As far as creating humans, there's quite a bit of meat to put on those bones to fully understand the whole of the evidence, but I can sketch a quick summary.
There were two "creations". They first genetically engineered "anatomically modern human" about 270K years ago, from (probably) homo erectus and their own genetic material. The Sumerians record that their were scads of failures trying to get it right. Horrifying, really.
They seem to have come back around to it in the Garden of Eden, creating "behaviorally modern humans" around 35K years ago. I haven't done much research, but I believe these were Cro-Magnons who were somewhat physically different but still quite compatible reproductively. We've all mixed and mingled in the time since.
As to the true Creator, one might still think it was the Father that Jesus refers to. The Greek of the NT can't be matched up as easily as the Hebrew, but there's a ton of clues that that Father is one of the Anunnaki and Jesus was sent by him. So we can't look to the Bible for information on that. What a surprising turn, eh?
I didn't know Biglino had gone that far. A few years ago he was pretty cagey when stepping around articles of faith. I mean, IDK if we have the evidence to say JC was the offspring of an Anunnaki in the usual sense, but he was not just some ordinary human and someone (probably Enlil) "arranged" for his birth through some mechanism. Think genetic engineering and artificial insemination, which we already know they had command of.
Rather than "genetic memory" as the mechanism for "anomalous cognition" of various types, I'm more drawn to the thesis that our awareness resides outside the body. This explains a tremendous range of phenomena like reincarnation, out-of-body experiences, remote viewing, near-death experiences, soul transfer, etc, etc.Then you just have to add to that thesis that our awarenesses are able to communicate with each other in whatever "realm" they really exist in and--presto--you have a phenomena that resembles genetic memory.
(I would note, though, that DNA very much does not seem to be the product of evolution. And given how much trouble they had first creating humans, I would place the original design of DNA outside the scope of their technology. Maybe this will serve as a clue at least pointing in the direction of the ultimate Creator.)
As for the recurrence of the theme of our "real" creation, I feel as certain as I can be that this is a conscious and deliberate act of "Them". The show "Westworld" was particularly telling, in very fine detail. To properly decode the messages sent, you had to correctly understand the Bible, then how the Bible was a distorted reference to the Anunnaki, and finally the deeply buried true nature of consciousness.
Turning around to look at those messages with hindsight, they are so exquisitely tailored it's impossible that they were vague "ideas" or "themes". I had to do no work stretching interpretations to make them conform to what I already believed. I'm shocked at how much they confirmed for me, but then again, were They really revealing anything if no one noticed?
Here's a fun note about messaging from "Them" and about what may drive people towards this topic. The "Alien" franchise came to have some of this messaging regarding the truth of the Anunnaki. In "Prometheus", the expedition is sent to find humanity's creators, who they call the "Engineers". There are a bunch of parallels to the Anunnaki, but there's one everyone missed.
The logo of the USCSS Prometheus, which you can see in the background and on their uniforms, is the "winged disk". The logo of the fictional Weyland-Yutani Corporation itself in that movie is a more stylized version. I've come to realize that this very ancient symbol represents Nibiru itself. I have reason to believe that, during it's close passage to the Earth, it could have had an appearance something like that. I was shocked when I saw it in the movie, and I've never heard anyone comment on it. Can you begin to convince yourself it's use was a coincidence?
Finally, as for why I do what I do, I fully believe humanity is locked in a struggle with Satan here on Earth, and a big reason we're not winning is that no one understands--or understands incorrectly--what's going on. I'm just doing my little part, spreading the word about just WTF is really going on.
Note: purposely damaged . . . where a few characters where removed (obviously) from the . . phrase
All ancient Hebrew sacred texts begin with an aleph, except Genesis. Bizarre, no? What happens if we put back just that single letter? Everything changes.
The Father of the Beginnings created the Elohim, the Heavens, and the Earth.
Weirdly very similar to the "purposely damaged . . . stenography in the Epstein images hosted on the NY Times site" , where a few characters where removed (obviously) from the embedded SSH key so it couldn't be retrieved with an automated tool.
FWIW, a few notes as I've been able to put the topic together. It turns out that the Elohim of the Bible are the same as the Anunnaki of the Sumerians. They wrote about them much more clearly than was done in the Bible, and I would suggest you'd be well served to study them in that context then refer back to the Bible.
The somewhat challenging part is to sort out who's who between the two contexts, because it's very easy to get confused. Here's a very short guide:
Anu is the king of the Anunnaki's home planet of Nibiru. He actually is never mentioned in the Bible so far as I know.
Enlil is his son and the leader of the expedition to the Earth. Technically, the Anunnaki refers specifically to this expedition: "those who to Earth from Heaven came". He is Yahweh of the Bible, and also referred to as El Elyon and Adonai (although I haven't done any sort of exhaustive study).
There were 600 Elohim/Anunnaki in total (plus some number of leaders). Satan, Michael, and Gabriel each led groups of 200. Satan rebelled with his faction who became known as the Fallen Angels. The rest of the expedition returned while they were marooned.
You may at this point be wondering about the real Almighty God, the Supreme Deity. He is not a Nibiruan, and this is the absolute and fundamental error of all Biblical exegesis. He is, though, mentioned a single time in the very first sentence (as you might expect), the mistranslated Genesis 1:1.
All ancient Hebrew sacred texts begin with an aleph, except Genesis. Bizarre, no? What happens if we put back just that single letter? Everything changes.
And that boots us into the interactions of the Anunnaki with our little planet.
I believe Enki is mentioned only in two places in the Bible:
It's not absolutely clear, but as to the identity of the "nachash" in the Garden of Eden narrative, I believe the strongest case is to be made for Enki. Note that I absolutely do not believe the nachash was Satan. This narrative is wildly misread, demonstrably so, and thus completely misunderstood.
He is mentioned a single time as "Shahar", and this was his name in the Ugarit pantheon. I don't think conventional researchers have yet made this association, but it seemed quite evident to me. How they miss all this stuff after so long is baffling.
As far as creating humans, there's quite a bit of meat to put on those bones to fully understand the whole of the evidence, but I can sketch a quick summary.
There were two "creations". They first genetically engineered "anatomically modern human" about 270K years ago, from (probably) homo erectus and their own genetic material. The Sumerians record that their were scads of failures trying to get it right. Horrifying, really.
They seem to have come back around to it in the Garden of Eden, creating "behaviorally modern humans" around 35K years ago. I haven't done much research, but I believe these were Cro-Magnons who were somewhat physically different but still quite compatible reproductively. We've all mixed and mingled in the time since.
As to the true Creator, one might still think it was the Father that Jesus refers to. The Greek of the NT can't be matched up as easily as the Hebrew, but there's a ton of clues that that Father is one of the Anunnaki and Jesus was sent by him. So we can't look to the Bible for information on that. What a surprising turn, eh?
I didn't know Biglino had gone that far. A few years ago he was pretty cagey when stepping around articles of faith. I mean, IDK if we have the evidence to say JC was the offspring of an Anunnaki in the usual sense, but he was not just some ordinary human and someone (probably Enlil) "arranged" for his birth through some mechanism. Think genetic engineering and artificial insemination, which we already know they had command of.
Rather than "genetic memory" as the mechanism for "anomalous cognition" of various types, I'm more drawn to the thesis that our awareness resides outside the body. This explains a tremendous range of phenomena like reincarnation, out-of-body experiences, remote viewing, near-death experiences, soul transfer, etc, etc.Then you just have to add to that thesis that our awarenesses are able to communicate with each other in whatever "realm" they really exist in and--presto--you have a phenomena that resembles genetic memory.
(I would note, though, that DNA very much does not seem to be the product of evolution. And given how much trouble they had first creating humans, I would place the original design of DNA outside the scope of their technology. Maybe this will serve as a clue at least pointing in the direction of the ultimate Creator.)
As for the recurrence of the theme of our "real" creation, I feel as certain as I can be that this is a conscious and deliberate act of "Them". The show "Westworld" was particularly telling, in very fine detail. To properly decode the messages sent, you had to correctly understand the Bible, then how the Bible was a distorted reference to the Anunnaki, and finally the deeply buried true nature of consciousness.
Turning around to look at those messages with hindsight, they are so exquisitely tailored it's impossible that they were vague "ideas" or "themes". I had to do no work stretching interpretations to make them conform to what I already believed. I'm shocked at how much they confirmed for me, but then again, were They really revealing anything if no one noticed?
Here's a fun note about messaging from "Them" and about what may drive people towards this topic. The "Alien" franchise came to have some of this messaging regarding the truth of the Anunnaki. In "Prometheus", the expedition is sent to find humanity's creators, who they call the "Engineers". There are a bunch of parallels to the Anunnaki, but there's one everyone missed.
The logo of the USCSS Prometheus, which you can see in the background and on their uniforms, is the "winged disk". The logo of the fictional Weyland-Yutani Corporation itself in that movie is a more stylized version. I've come to realize that this very ancient symbol represents Nibiru itself. I have reason to believe that, during it's close passage to the Earth, it could have had an appearance something like that. I was shocked when I saw it in the movie, and I've never heard anyone comment on it. Can you begin to convince yourself it's use was a coincidence?
Finally, as for why I do what I do, I fully believe humanity is locked in a struggle with Satan here on Earth, and a big reason we're not winning is that no one understands--or understands incorrectly--what's going on. I'm just doing my little part, spreading the word about just WTF is really going on.
Note: purposely damaged . . . where a few characters where removed (obviously) from the . . phrase
Weirdly very similar to the "purposely damaged . . . stenography in the Epstein images hosted on the NY Times site" , where a few characters where removed (obviously) from the embedded SSH key so it couldn't be retrieved with an automated tool.
See the current thread