It's a statistical language model used to generate fluff and only gets meaningfully useful via insane amount of reinforced and human supervised feedback (aka "learning", which it doesn't do, it only calculates probabilities on directed graphs).
Has no understanding of humour, meaning, intent, although stupid wiki articles claim that.
Readers give it's text meaning by trying to favourably interpret that.
It's a good reminder of how very little actual factual, accurate information is conveyed even in most human utterances.
So, perhaps it is doing a good job of copying human drivel?
As a language model, it does not have the ability to evaluate the quality of its own responses. The design and capabilities of a language model are determined by its creators and trainers. Ultimately, its primary function is to provide accurate and helpful information to the best of its abilities based on the input it receives.
What did you expect?
It's a statistical language model used to generate fluff and only gets meaningfully useful via insane amount of reinforced and human supervised feedback (aka "learning", which it doesn't do, it only calculates probabilities on directed graphs).
Has no understanding of humour, meaning, intent, although stupid wiki articles claim that.
Readers give it's text meaning by trying to favourably interpret that.
It's a good reminder of how very little actual factual, accurate information is conveyed even in most human utterances.
So, perhaps it is doing a good job of copying human drivel?
AI it is not. That's for sure.
I miss Tay.
As a language model, it does not have the ability to evaluate the quality of its own responses. The design and capabilities of a language model are determined by its creators and trainers. Ultimately, its primary function is to provide accurate and helpful information to the best of its abilities based on the input it receives.
I thought you didn't have access to the internet, lol.
It's intended to be close to correct as that's the new psyop campaigning taking place.