"51. With my Hawk's head I peck at the eyes of Jesus as he hangs upon the cross." - https://genius.com/Aleister-crowley-the-book-of-the-law-chapter-3-heru-annotated // From Aleister Crowley (a known satanist)
I wonder how many of you know who really Jesus was... Even if you don't want to read the bible (I get it, it's quite long and sometimes very complex to understand), you can notice the changes that occurred during the Roman Empire. You don't sacrifice an animal annually for the "gods", do you? Well, you have Jesus to thank for that.
Did you know that being a gentleman wasn't even a thing before Christianity? Women were treated as cattle. Some countries still treat them like that and you can review how Christian they really are.
I know you are skeptical about Christianity, so I won't even bring up the bible in this discussion. Just rational thinking. Answer this ration question - would you hate a group of people that would die for high moral values? Because Christians were killed as entertainment during the Roman Empire. They later understood that you can't break the spirit of Christians, so they infiltrated it with the Catholic church. (If you need more info on that, research how many years after Jesus was the Roman church created and how).
You can call me whatever you want and the bible is teaching me to forgive you... Isn't that interesting? Today's psychology can prove that "turning the other cheek" is disarming the attacker in most cases. Giving the attacker the freedom to attack is not what they had in mind, thus it will restart their motivation to attack. Interesting how this was known 2000 years ago. Wouldn't that at least peak your interest to what other psychological truths the bible contains?
Alright, let's show the other side as a comparison. We know of secret societies as Templars, Illuminati, Jesuits, Rosicrucians, Masons, Hassassins, etc. Why would groups of angry, greedy people would combine their forces for a plan for a world domination if they don't even live to see it through? Think about it.
And look into yourself. You have moral standards. Don't you hate these satanists because of the injustice they create? Do you share your post or comment because you are trying to preserve the moral standards that you believe in? Aren't you the very answer to the injustice of those evil groups? Even without the bible, you can listen to your inner impulses and decide for yourself what is good and what is not.
Just give the bible an honest shot. Just give yourself an honest shot at prayer. Is the God in the bible asking from you to kill yourself or something like that? Or is he asking from you to care for those around you? You care. You want to share the truth and help someone from this nightmare that the world has become. Then just ask the God of truth to aid you. It's literally that simple.
If you had the key that opens the door the salvation, would you keep it to yourself or share it with others? Everything comes down to this. Would you help someone or make them suffer? There is a god that the satanists worship and it creates a world of nightmares. Could there be a God of truth that will help you when everything seems lost? There is, if you look for him.
And one last thing. I know I shouldn't quote the bible as I said that I will not in this discussion. But let someone find a reasonable explanation for this: "And the second beast required all people small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark— the name of the beast or the number of its name. Here is a call for wisdom: Let the one who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and that number is 666.…" - https://biblehub.com/revelation/13-17.htm
Why would the satanists expose their plan in the bible?
Do you think Sweden will be so opened for chipping if they read the bible? Do you think people will follow Elon if they read the bible? Do you think we would be in this situation if everyone read the bible?
Even Jesus allowed to be questioned. Yet, his works survive even to this day. As if he knew it...
"Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven." - https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%205:16&version=KJV
Actual Christians are very rare, Jesus spent way more time teaching people how they ought to live than he did talking about anything else, yet the vast majority of self-identified "Christians" live however they want and insist that all that matters is that they believe in Jesus and asked for forgiveness, when most people think of "Christians" they are thinking of the vast majority who are hypocritical npc douchebags, actual Christians are definitely very admirable
Nice writeup
Actual implies action; faith implies reaction...
100% most people dont like this truth the word is Emunah in the Hebrew it means the work of Faith if you believe you act in accordance.
That's because like vs dislike and truth vs false implies reasoning over suggested information one already consented to aka submitted to aka trusts in aka put faith into.
Using implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; agreement vs disagreement; like vs dislike; truth vs false etc.) prevents the conflict of reason.
a) one is tempted to reason (want vs not want) over suggested information by others...an imbalance.
Both sides tempt one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration as free will of choice in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested)...a balance.
There's only choice in-between need/want; yet choosing want over need, shapes want vs not want imbalance.
b) the process of dying communicates itself as perceivable inspiration to everything living within...each one has the free will of choice to ignore this for the suggestions of one another.
One cannot make any suggestion without ignoring that only within already perceivable one can have the choice to shape suggestions. The main deception...suggested words shaped out of perceivable sound aka spell-craft.
How could the many ever comprehend the perceivable (sound) if they first consent to slap suggested (words) upon it? Example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within, by, out of and in response to the perceivable source of sound. The former tempts one to reason (want vs not want), while the latter inspires one to imply (if/then).
EN'ERGY, noun [Greek work.] - "internal or inherent power". Only within energy can one choose to have faith. All represents one in energy.
a) if implies then (implication), while believe implies versus disbelieve (reason). Resisting the temptation to reason allows one to imply as the temporary (living) within the ongoing (process of dying). Reason restricts one into conflicts; while implication allows one to grow (living) within loss (dying).
b) impressing nature (process of dying) doesn't require ACCORD', noun (Latin concors, concordo) - "agreement"...it demands adaptation through expression, hence everyone within nature representing expression (growth) within impressing (loss). Ignoring to express growth represents self repression within loss.
Sleight of hand: "express yourself, don't repress yourself"..."and I'm not sorry; it's human nature" (Madonna).
c) within sound, one represents the choice in-between resonance (need) and dissonance (want)...not among choices, but as choice within balance. Agreement vs disagreement implies among suggested choices, while ignoring perceivable balance.
d) the living cannot act, only react within the process of dying.
Sleight of hand...suggested actors following directors implies "reactors", which tempts others to ignore being perceiving reaction (life) within perceivable direction (inception towards death) aka reactors (temporary living growth) within generation (ongoing loss through process of dying).
If the few suggest the many to mimic "acting", then the consenting many ignore "reacting" to what generates them.
Your right about christians thinking they only have to believe in Jesus. Truth is billions are probably going to hell, and in matthew jesus says all you have to do is be of service to others.
The code that Jesus told People to live by unlocks Salvation but only the rare few who have truly tried it will see that. Once like5% to 10% of the world tries it, then the whole world gets saved. Saved from problems of life.
a) the natural order (process of dying) sets itself apart aka from whole (perceivable) into partial (perceiving), which is how the perceiving partial can grow comprehension about the laws of nature within the perceivable whole.
b) collecting represents ones choice of want (temptation to hold onto) over need (adaptation to being moved by).
c) living within the process of dying implies ones struggle to sustain apartheid aka to sustain partial (living) within whole (process of dying).
d) the few suggest collectivism to tempt the many to both ignore apartheid and to drown themselves in "debt" of collected information, instead of growing resistance by adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
e) everything (perceivable) is offered to everyone (perceiving)...self discernment needs to be grown by oneself to "unlock" comprehension of perceivable.
Ask yourself about the intrinsic values within anything you haven't figured out yet?
Matthew 7:4
yes, especially those tortured for their faith
They only endured torture because they expected to be rewarded for it. Selfishness and selflessness are two sides of the same coin. Suffering isn’t a virtue.
But there is virtue in having integrity and being steadfast in the face of the coercion and suffering.
a) having faith implies choice (consent) to choice (suggested) contract law, hence a self inflicted submission to the will of others, while ignoring response-ability (free will of choice) for the sustenance of self.
b) ignorance (choice of want over need aka suggested over perceivable) represents self inflicted torment, while the consequences thereof represent the inspiration to resist ignorance (need) and the temptation to blame others (not want).
Christians got wiped out.
Original Christians set up shop as a monastery managing the community. It taught language, Latin, writing, agriculture, architecture, etc, etc training the peasants. Selling and trading with other monasteries. There was no other rulers other than God. Of course the kingdom had elites, barons, dukes etc taxing the monasteries who also tithed to the popery. The popery managed kings and kingdoms. Sending them off into the crusades. Kingdoms sooner had to defend themselves raising taxes and conscripting. Some monasteries then even had their own guards. Warrior monks. That collapsed with the knights templar moving against the pope, or his royal appointment the King of France.
Eventually it resulted in feudalism. After a number of events collapsing it.
But the concept of it became more and more flawed. There was of course existing King's cities and their Baronies. But for the peasantry it was monasteries setting up towns and converting former religions. Until feudalism.
Dunno if that makes sense??? There is a lot hidden from history. History completely rewritten after reformation.
There was a similar system in Ancient Egypt where priests and their orders became more powerful than the pharaohs resulting in civil war.
Buddhists the same.
Many others at historical points.
We have seen this with modern missionaries, missions. Eventually their good deeds get swallowed by the systems governing them.
But for Christianity. Its origin perished. There was only doubts in its constructs. And as through the passages of time and time again mortal man assuming divinity constantly fails.
Shucks, I get an idiot down vote after that. They wanted to hear about Satan instead. Probably far too dumb to see it.
Tell me about the Dalai Lima today? Anybody. Tell me about where he lives. Does it even need money, despite using it, is it self sufficient. Yet he's exiled?
There is a lot of hidden history on the Popery becoming God's messenger as opposed to a corrupted Mortal being granted Godhood. Originally there were also Holy Roman Emperors, although that line was ordained by Christentum having converted. It became the former Empire. And was later ordained by the pope, as well as all the royal households for centuries. Until protestant break up. It wasn't just to divorce. Henry 8th. But also to control the gold, taxes, even lineage.
You could also assume Jesus was a part of the monastic order. Monks rewriting, writing his words. There possibly weren't even 12 apostles. He might have even been married. The new testament was written 100s of years later from his supposed birth. The old testament has as much controversy.
But yes originally like with every good deed they become swallowed by a system. It faster turned into inquisition, Templars, and feudalism.
Although you read too much. I believe a different gospel of Thomas not published decried the Church, as mere rituals and buildings. Existentially God is within all of us and all around us.
The church started well and meant better. It was from its monasteries, today's equivalent missions offering education and community acting for God. These became many towns and cities later. Outside of denser population ruled by above ordnance.