"51. With my Hawk's head I peck at the eyes of Jesus as he hangs upon the cross." - https://genius.com/Aleister-crowley-the-book-of-the-law-chapter-3-heru-annotated // From Aleister Crowley (a known satanist)
I wonder how many of you know who really Jesus was... Even if you don't want to read the bible (I get it, it's quite long and sometimes very complex to understand), you can notice the changes that occurred during the Roman Empire. You don't sacrifice an animal annually for the "gods", do you? Well, you have Jesus to thank for that.
Did you know that being a gentleman wasn't even a thing before Christianity? Women were treated as cattle. Some countries still treat them like that and you can review how Christian they really are.
I know you are skeptical about Christianity, so I won't even bring up the bible in this discussion. Just rational thinking. Answer this ration question - would you hate a group of people that would die for high moral values? Because Christians were killed as entertainment during the Roman Empire. They later understood that you can't break the spirit of Christians, so they infiltrated it with the Catholic church. (If you need more info on that, research how many years after Jesus was the Roman church created and how).
You can call me whatever you want and the bible is teaching me to forgive you... Isn't that interesting? Today's psychology can prove that "turning the other cheek" is disarming the attacker in most cases. Giving the attacker the freedom to attack is not what they had in mind, thus it will restart their motivation to attack. Interesting how this was known 2000 years ago. Wouldn't that at least peak your interest to what other psychological truths the bible contains?
Alright, let's show the other side as a comparison. We know of secret societies as Templars, Illuminati, Jesuits, Rosicrucians, Masons, Hassassins, etc. Why would groups of angry, greedy people would combine their forces for a plan for a world domination if they don't even live to see it through? Think about it.
And look into yourself. You have moral standards. Don't you hate these satanists because of the injustice they create? Do you share your post or comment because you are trying to preserve the moral standards that you believe in? Aren't you the very answer to the injustice of those evil groups? Even without the bible, you can listen to your inner impulses and decide for yourself what is good and what is not.
Just give the bible an honest shot. Just give yourself an honest shot at prayer. Is the God in the bible asking from you to kill yourself or something like that? Or is he asking from you to care for those around you? You care. You want to share the truth and help someone from this nightmare that the world has become. Then just ask the God of truth to aid you. It's literally that simple.
If you had the key that opens the door the salvation, would you keep it to yourself or share it with others? Everything comes down to this. Would you help someone or make them suffer? There is a god that the satanists worship and it creates a world of nightmares. Could there be a God of truth that will help you when everything seems lost? There is, if you look for him.
And one last thing. I know I shouldn't quote the bible as I said that I will not in this discussion. But let someone find a reasonable explanation for this: "And the second beast required all people small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark— the name of the beast or the number of its name. Here is a call for wisdom: Let the one who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and that number is 666.…" - https://biblehub.com/revelation/13-17.htm
Why would the satanists expose their plan in the bible?
Do you think Sweden will be so opened for chipping if they read the bible? Do you think people will follow Elon if they read the bible? Do you think we would be in this situation if everyone read the bible?
Even Jesus allowed to be questioned. Yet, his works survive even to this day. As if he knew it...
"Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven." - https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%205:16&version=KJV
100% most people dont like this truth the word is Emunah in the Hebrew it means the work of Faith if you believe you act in accordance.
That's because like vs dislike and truth vs false implies reasoning over suggested information one already consented to aka submitted to aka trusts in aka put faith into.
Using implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; agreement vs disagreement; like vs dislike; truth vs false etc.) prevents the conflict of reason.
a) one is tempted to reason (want vs not want) over suggested information by others...an imbalance.
Both sides tempt one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration as free will of choice in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested)...a balance.
There's only choice in-between need/want; yet choosing want over need, shapes want vs not want imbalance.
b) the process of dying communicates itself as perceivable inspiration to everything living within...each one has the free will of choice to ignore this for the suggestions of one another.
One cannot make any suggestion without ignoring that only within already perceivable one can have the choice to shape suggestions. The main deception...suggested words shaped out of perceivable sound aka spell-craft.
How could the many ever comprehend the perceivable (sound) if they first consent to slap suggested (words) upon it? Example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within, by, out of and in response to the perceivable source of sound. The former tempts one to reason (want vs not want), while the latter inspires one to imply (if/then).
EN'ERGY, noun [Greek work.] - "internal or inherent power". Only within energy can one choose to have faith. All represents one in energy.
a) if implies then (implication), while believe implies versus disbelieve (reason). Resisting the temptation to reason allows one to imply as the temporary (living) within the ongoing (process of dying). Reason restricts one into conflicts; while implication allows one to grow (living) within loss (dying).
b) impressing nature (process of dying) doesn't require ACCORD', noun (Latin concors, concordo) - "agreement"...it demands adaptation through expression, hence everyone within nature representing expression (growth) within impressing (loss). Ignoring to express growth represents self repression within loss.
Sleight of hand: "express yourself, don't repress yourself"..."and I'm not sorry; it's human nature" (Madonna).
c) within sound, one represents the choice in-between resonance (need) and dissonance (want)...not among choices, but as choice within balance. Agreement vs disagreement implies among suggested choices, while ignoring perceivable balance.
d) the living cannot act, only react within the process of dying.
Sleight of hand...suggested actors following directors implies "reactors", which tempts others to ignore being perceiving reaction (life) within perceivable direction (inception towards death) aka reactors (temporary living growth) within generation (ongoing loss through process of dying).
If the few suggest the many to mimic "acting", then the consenting many ignore "reacting" to what generates them.