....must be controlled opposition. It's impossible for someone to be right on 99% of things but then, say, think JFK was killed by the Mafia when, everybody who's anybody, knows it was the CIA.
Also, anyone who didn't get everything spot on correct with their analysis must be as well. This of course, means that even someone who fell for the COVID scam, then came to their senses (even doing so really early in the scam) is controlled opposition.
Also, anybody who gets a lot of social media follows is clearly a sell out quisling. They should be relatively voiceless, like me, else they must be on the take like a dirty cop.
I'm never wrong, either, by the way. Which means I'm not controlled opposition.
Just wanted to clear that up for you all. Carry on.
Good comeback.
Reminds me of some youtube twisted narrative in which vader was the good guy and the rebels were disobedient mongrels trying to overthrow the peace and civility of the empire. LOL
The prequels mucked up the narrative, and from a "Caesar should take charge" perspective, that was correct if you're going by the original trilogy era canon. The Republic was messed up and failing, like all late stage Republics do. Then along comes Palpatine and he brings order, even if it is one that isn't pretty and they enslave wookies. Palpatine was like Napoleon at the end of the French Revolution but prior to him starting out trying to make an empire. At that point, he was doing a good thing, from most people's point of view.
With the prequels, it was Palpatine making things shitty in order to create the unstable conditions for him to seize power. George Lucas modeled prequels Palpatine after George W. Bush. However, the Rebels in the original trilogy were somewhat modeled after the Viet Cong and the Empire was obviously the Nazis.