Well. I didnt really doubt the tweet. Seems like something these people would do. Unbelievable really. Had to look it up myself because people are intentionally making us look crazy by feeding us misinformation. So if anything good came out of r/conspiracy in the last 4 years, it was at least verifying if these things were legit tweets or not. Even though that doesnt work with anything that closely resembles THE truth. That seems to be purged rather quickly and thoroughly.

It's legit. Again after my experience with wcb and the college of physicians, i didnt have any doubts. Criminals, all of them.

https://www.leg.bc.ca/content/data%20-%20ldp/Pages/42nd3rd/1st_read/PDF/gov36-1.pdf

Penalties 518 (1) An individual who commits an offence listed in (b) section 514 (2) is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $200 000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than 6 months, or to both, or

514 (1) A person who contravenes section 30 [unauthorized use of titles] or 34 [false or misleading information] commits an offence. (2) A person who does any of the following commits an offence: (a) knowingly discloses information in contravention of a provision of this Act or the regulations; (b) knowingly provides false or misleading information to a person who is exercising a power or performing a duty under this Act, or a person acting under the order or direction of that person; (c) wilfully interferes with or obstructs another person in the exercise of a power or performance of a duty under this Act or in carrying out an order made under this Act.

Seems legit to me. Just fancy talk for [official narrative].

I had a legit laugh at this one.

516 If a corporation other than a regulatory college commits an offence under section 514 [offences], an employee, officer, director or agent of the corporation who authorizes, permits or acquiesces in the offence also commits the offence.

[criminal mother fuckers]

"The bill was met with heavy criticism, some describing it as a “hate speech” law that would give authorities the power to police speech. Some also feared it would be used to crush dissent.

The bill defined “hatred” as “the emotion that involves detestation or vilification and that is stronger than dislike or disdain.”

If it passed, those found guilty of online hate would face house arrest and fines of up to $70,000."