Artemis I Fakery
(www.msn.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
This is supposedly the Earth "rising" from behind the moon
Anything seem off to you about this clip?
Why would the light source illuminate the Earth as well as Artemis I, but then the "dark side of the moon" is 100% black; ZERO light
How does the moon dodge the light of the sun?
Where are literally ANY stars in view?
Embarrassing that people gobble this slop up
what would be the point of faking all of this? can any of you "everything is fake" people ever answer that? the earth being flat, or a pencil, or a fucking turtle shell wouldn't change life AT ALL for anybody. IF, big IF there is an ultra mother fuckin conspiracy to lie about the shape of the earth, lie about space, the sun, planets, moon and everything else, what would be the point of that?
and no, you can't use the same answer as every other flat earther or "space is fake" guy and say "because they lie to us about a lot of other things, why trust them on this?"
I’m a “space is fake” person but think the earth is spherical. I’ve studied atmospheric sciences for 30+ years and understand that weather systems wouldn’t work with a flat earth. When I say space is fake, I mean the way it is presented to us and what we are told is truth is not. I think it started as a lie (moon landing) to get TVs into homes that has morphed into what we are seeing today with zoomed in pictures of food representing telescopic views of galaxies and whatnot. Ultimately, “space” is a money laundering scheme by the US government. We don’t know a damn thing about actual space.
What makes you say that? I don’t see any reason to assume the weather depends on the shape of the world.
Coriolis force is best explained with a spherical shape for the earth. You need the constant movement towards equilibrium to create weather disturbances with rotation and heat aiding in their development.