a) if copy (living) exists within origin (process of dying)...is it still a copy? Does a partial (reaction) within a whole (action) represent a copy (likeness) or a difference within sameness?
b) what if suggested words exist within perceivable sound?
c) can one suggest writing without utilizing perceivable symmetry?
who had information
a) IN (being within) FORM (formed by) -ATION (through action)...doesn't that imply being the formed reaction (living) within enacting flow (process of dying)?
b) what if perceivable inspiration represents the origin of suggested information? What if the few shape suggested information to distract the consenting many from perceivable inspiration?
c) what could the elder learn that the younger hasn't experienced yet?
TLDR: It's either a forgery (i.e copied off an original) OR written by someone who had information.
Either way it's valid and important!!
a) if copy (living) exists within origin (process of dying)...is it still a copy? Does a partial (reaction) within a whole (action) represent a copy (likeness) or a difference within sameness?
b) what if suggested words exist within perceivable sound?
c) can one suggest writing without utilizing perceivable symmetry?
a) IN (being within) FORM (formed by) -ATION (through action)...doesn't that imply being the formed reaction (living) within enacting flow (process of dying)?
b) what if perceivable inspiration represents the origin of suggested information? What if the few shape suggested information to distract the consenting many from perceivable inspiration?
c) what could the elder learn that the younger hasn't experienced yet?
Keep working on changing or obfuscating definitions, it's (((your))) way.